Upgrading of conventional water treatment plant by nanofiltration for enhanced organic matter removal

Natural organic matter (NOM) is responsible for a variety of problems in water, including taste, odor, and color. If NOM is present in treated water, it can also promote microbial growth in water distribution systems. Another problem related with NOM is that it combines with chemicals such as chlorine in water resulting in the formation of disinfection by-products (DBPs). With the DBP regulations becoming more stringent, several advanced treatment methods started to be applied to enhance NOM removal. Pilot-scale advanced treatment tests employing tight nanofiltration (T-NF) membrane with high ion rejection capacity and loose nanofiltration (L-NF) membrane with low ion rejection capacity were conducted in this study in order to remove total organic carbon (TOC) having an average concentration of 2 mg/L at the sand filter effluent of a full-scale drinking water treatment plant and to avoid DBP production. The cost of incorporating membrane processes into the treatment process scheme was also determined during the study, in addition to the experimental studies. At constant 6 bar, the average fluxes for the T-NF and L-NF were determined to be 12.7 and 7.6 L /m² h, respectively. L-NF had a TOC removal efficiency of 96.0%, which is quite similar to the removal efficiency achieved by T-NF (96.3%). Heavy metals, anions, and cations removal efficiency in T-NF membranes were greater than in L-NF, as expected. The removal efficiencies of Cl^-, and Fe on T-NF membrane were determined to be 90.3 ± 2.2% and 69.6 ± 5.6, respectively, which are much greater than those achieved in L-NF membrane The total cost of 400,000 m³/d L-NF membrane system upgrade is calculated as 28,901,262 $/y including capital and operation and maintenance (O&M) costs, while in T-NF is calculated as 28,074,282 $/y. The total cost of NF upgrading is estimated to be around 0.191–0.198 $/m³, which is nearly 50% of the cost of the conventional treatment plant. When upgrading a conventional treatment system with this type of membrane system, additional expenses are typically incurred, resulting in a higher total cost; however, the resultant water quality is significantly improved.