TY - JOUR
T1 - Specific proteins mediate enhanced osteoblast adhesion on nanophase ceramics
AU - Webster, Thomas J.
AU - Ergun, Celaletdin
AU - Doremus, Robert H.
AU - Siegel, Richard W.
AU - Bizios, Rena
PY - 2000/9/5
Y1 - 2000/9/5
N2 - Osteoblast, fibroblast, and endothelial cell adhesion on nanophase (that is, materials with grain sizes less than 100 nm) alumina, titania, and hydroxyapatite (HA) was investigated using in vitro cellular models. Osteoblast adhesion was significantly (p < 0.01) greater after 4 h on nanophase alumina, titania, and HA than it was on conventional formulations of the same ceramics. In contrast, compared to conventional alumina, titania, and HA, after 4 h fibroblast adhesion was significantly (p < 0.01) less on nanophase ceramics. Examination of the underlying mechanism(s) of cell adhesion on nanophase ceramics revealed that these ceramics adsorbed significantly (p < 0.01) greater quantities of vitronectin, which, subsequently, may have contributed to the observed select enhanced adhesion of osteoblasts. Select enhanced osteoblast adhesion was independent of surface chemistry and material phase but was dependent on the surface topography (specifically on grain and pore size) of nanophase ceramics. The capability of synthesizing and processing nanomaterials with tailored (through, for example, specific grain and pore size) structures and topographies to control select subsequent cell functions provides the possibility of designing the novel proactive biomaterials (that is, materials that elicit specific, timely, and desirable responses from surrounding cells and tissues) necessary for improved implant efficacy. (C) 2000 John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
AB - Osteoblast, fibroblast, and endothelial cell adhesion on nanophase (that is, materials with grain sizes less than 100 nm) alumina, titania, and hydroxyapatite (HA) was investigated using in vitro cellular models. Osteoblast adhesion was significantly (p < 0.01) greater after 4 h on nanophase alumina, titania, and HA than it was on conventional formulations of the same ceramics. In contrast, compared to conventional alumina, titania, and HA, after 4 h fibroblast adhesion was significantly (p < 0.01) less on nanophase ceramics. Examination of the underlying mechanism(s) of cell adhesion on nanophase ceramics revealed that these ceramics adsorbed significantly (p < 0.01) greater quantities of vitronectin, which, subsequently, may have contributed to the observed select enhanced adhesion of osteoblasts. Select enhanced osteoblast adhesion was independent of surface chemistry and material phase but was dependent on the surface topography (specifically on grain and pore size) of nanophase ceramics. The capability of synthesizing and processing nanomaterials with tailored (through, for example, specific grain and pore size) structures and topographies to control select subsequent cell functions provides the possibility of designing the novel proactive biomaterials (that is, materials that elicit specific, timely, and desirable responses from surrounding cells and tissues) necessary for improved implant efficacy. (C) 2000 John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
KW - Adhesion
KW - Ceramics
KW - Nanophase
KW - Orthopedic/dental
KW - Osteoblasts
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034609621&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/1097-4636(20000905)51:3<475::AID-JBM23>3.0.CO;2-9
DO - 10.1002/1097-4636(20000905)51:3<475::AID-JBM23>3.0.CO;2-9
M3 - Article
C2 - 10880091
AN - SCOPUS:0034609621
SN - 0021-9304
VL - 51
SP - 475
EP - 483
JO - Journal of Biomedical Materials Research
JF - Journal of Biomedical Materials Research
IS - 3
ER -