TY - JOUR
T1 - Physically-Based Ground Motion Prediction and Validation
T2 - A Case Study of Mid-Sized Marmara Sea Earthquakes
AU - Mert, Aydın
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, Springer Nature. All rights reserved.
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - Computation of realistic time histories for different locations around Marmara region can be helpful for engineering design, retrofitting the existing structures, hazard and risk management studies and developing new seismic codes and standards. This paper had two main purposes. The first one was to simulate five moderate earthquakes (Mw 5.0) recorded in the Marmara region. We synthesized ground motion for the full wave train on three components, and applied a ‘physics based’ solution of earthquake rupture. For each earthquake, we synthesized seismograms using 500 different rupture scenarios that were generated by Monte Carlo selection of parameters within the range. The second purpose was to validate synthetic seismogram with real seismogram. To develop credibility of a synthetic seismogram in engineering point of view, we followed the methodology of Anderson (13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 2003 [1]). Because this methodology produces source and site specific synthetic ground motion time histories and goodness-of-fit scores of obtained synthetics was between ‘good’ to ‘excellent’ range based on Anderson’s score. We concluded that it can be used to produce ground motion that has not previously been recorded during catastrophic earthquakes.
AB - Computation of realistic time histories for different locations around Marmara region can be helpful for engineering design, retrofitting the existing structures, hazard and risk management studies and developing new seismic codes and standards. This paper had two main purposes. The first one was to simulate five moderate earthquakes (Mw 5.0) recorded in the Marmara region. We synthesized ground motion for the full wave train on three components, and applied a ‘physics based’ solution of earthquake rupture. For each earthquake, we synthesized seismograms using 500 different rupture scenarios that were generated by Monte Carlo selection of parameters within the range. The second purpose was to validate synthetic seismogram with real seismogram. To develop credibility of a synthetic seismogram in engineering point of view, we followed the methodology of Anderson (13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 2003 [1]). Because this methodology produces source and site specific synthetic ground motion time histories and goodness-of-fit scores of obtained synthetics was between ‘good’ to ‘excellent’ range based on Anderson’s score. We concluded that it can be used to produce ground motion that has not previously been recorded during catastrophic earthquakes.
KW - Earthquake simulation
KW - Empirical Green’s Functions
KW - Marmara region
KW - Physics based solution
KW - Validate synthetic seismogram
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85134479660&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/978-3-030-01656-2_42
DO - 10.1007/978-3-030-01656-2_42
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85134479660
SN - 2522-8714
SP - 187
EP - 190
JO - Advances in Science, Technology and Innovation
JF - Advances in Science, Technology and Innovation
ER -