Ana gezinime geç Aramaya geç Ana içeriğe geç

ORC assisted ballast water treatment under the EU ETS: Comparative assessment of UV, electrochlorination, and thermal options

Araştırma çıktısı: Dergi yayınıMakaleHakem

Özet

Ballast water treatment (BWT) is mandatory, and its lifecycle cost increasingly depends on carbon pricing. This study quantifies the energy and cost trade‑offs of three options for a BDELTA‑type handymax bulk carrier (ballast pump 1,600 m3h‑1; 34 operations yr‑1): filtration + UV with double pass, filtration + electrochlorination (EC) at 10 mg L‑1TRO, and an exploratory thermal pasteurization case (55 oC) using waste‑heat plus a fired boiler. A 100 kW Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) recovers main‑engine waste heat and supplies BWT electricity; surplus generation is credited to hotel loads. Costs include fuel and EU ETS allowances (80 USD tCO2, 70% coverage in 2025) and are annualized with a 7% discount rate over 20 years. A deterministic model is complemented with a ±10% Monte Carlo analysis of key parameters. ORC output exceeds the electrical demand of UV and EC, leaving substantial surplus. The resulting net annualized costs are 20 kUSD yr‑1for UV+ORC and about ‑2.9 kUSD yr‑1(a small net saving) for EC+ORC, while thermal treatment remains prohibitive at 1.96 MUSD yr‑1because the boiler must supply most of the heat. The ranking is robust in the Monte Carlo results; variations in fuel and ETS price move totals but do not change the preference for UV/ EC over thermal. The thermal pathway is presented as a feasibility case rather than a type‑approved solution. Overall, coupling UV or EC with a modest ORC module yields low net operating cost for treatment electricity while reducing ETS exposure through avoided auxiliary‑generator use. Thermal pasteurization is only economically plausible if near‑free, high‑grade heat and effective heat recovery are available, and the approach can be validated under current IMO/USCG protocols. Thermal treatment may be economically plausible only when continuous waste‑heat recirculation (multi‑pass) is used with well‑insulated tanks. In practice, it is unlikely to be viable for short trials.

Orijinal dilİngilizce
Sayfa (başlangıç-bitiş)724-740
Sayfa sayısı17
DergiEnvironmental Research and Technology
Hacim8
Basın numarası3
DOI'lar
Yayın durumuYayınlandı - 30 Eyl 2025

Bibliyografik not

Publisher Copyright:
© This is an open access article under the CC BY‑NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by‑nc/4.0/).

BM SKH

Bu sonuç, aşağıdaki Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Hedefine/Hedeflerine katkıda bulunur

  1. SKH 6 - Temiz Su ve Sanitasyon
    SKH 6 Temiz Su ve Sanitasyon
  2. SKH 13 - İklim Eylemi
    SKH 13 İklim Eylemi

Parmak izi

ORC assisted ballast water treatment under the EU ETS: Comparative assessment of UV, electrochlorination, and thermal options' araştırma başlıklarına git. Birlikte benzersiz bir parmak izi oluştururlar.

Alıntı Yap