TY - JOUR
T1 - Modeling of surface conductance over sunn hemp by artificial neural network
AU - Şaylan, Levent
AU - Kimura, Reiji
AU - Altinbaş, Nilcan
AU - Çaldağ, Barış
AU - Bakanoğullari, Fatih
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 L. Şaylan, R. Kimura, N.Altinbaş, B. Çaldağ, F. Bakanoğullari.
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - Performances of an Artificial Neural Network (ANN), a multiple linear regression (MLR) and the Jarvis type model were compared to estimate the surface conductance which is a driving factor affecting evapotranspiration. It was modeled by ANN and MLR using various parameters including global solar radiation, temperature, soil water content, relative humidity, precipitation and irrigation, vapor pressure deficit, wind speed and leaf area index. The measurements were carried out during the growing season of sunn hemp in 2004. The best relationship (r2=0.73) between the surface conductance and all variables was estimated by the ANN when r2 was 0.91 in the training period. The average absolute relative error was 26.54% for the ANN (r2=0.80), 51.07% for the MLR (r2=0.53) and 58.30% for Jarvis model (r2=0.26) when vapor pressure deficit, temperature, soil water content, global solar radiation and leaf area index were considered to model. The results showed that the ANN approach had a better modeling potential of the surface conductance compared to the MLR and Jarvis model.
AB - Performances of an Artificial Neural Network (ANN), a multiple linear regression (MLR) and the Jarvis type model were compared to estimate the surface conductance which is a driving factor affecting evapotranspiration. It was modeled by ANN and MLR using various parameters including global solar radiation, temperature, soil water content, relative humidity, precipitation and irrigation, vapor pressure deficit, wind speed and leaf area index. The measurements were carried out during the growing season of sunn hemp in 2004. The best relationship (r2=0.73) between the surface conductance and all variables was estimated by the ANN when r2 was 0.91 in the training period. The average absolute relative error was 26.54% for the ANN (r2=0.80), 51.07% for the MLR (r2=0.53) and 58.30% for Jarvis model (r2=0.26) when vapor pressure deficit, temperature, soil water content, global solar radiation and leaf area index were considered to model. The results showed that the ANN approach had a better modeling potential of the surface conductance compared to the MLR and Jarvis model.
KW - Agriculture
KW - Air-water interaction
KW - Evapotranspiration
KW - Neural Networks
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85078639116&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.13128/ijam-589
DO - 10.13128/ijam-589
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85078639116
SN - 1824-8705
VL - 2019
SP - 37
EP - 48
JO - Italian Journal of Agrometeorology
JF - Italian Journal of Agrometeorology
IS - 3
ER -