TY - JOUR
T1 - INVESTIGATION OF THE EFFECT OF COMPRESSION RATIO AND DIFFERENT FUELS ON CO2 EMISSIONS
AU - Doğan, Hüseyin Emre
AU - Demirci, Abdurrahman
AU - Kutlar, Osman Akın
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 by Begell House, Inc.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Air pollution caused by the exhaust gases of internal combustion engines threatens the future of these machines. CO2, which is normally non-polluting but causes global warming, has necessitated limiting the emission of this gas. Therefore, reducing CO2 production at its source is the most effective method. In particular, the use of fuels with a high H/C ratio, such as compressed natural gas (CNG), signifi-cantly reduces CO2 emission. In this study, the contribution of different mechanisms to CO2 reduction was examined by combining both thermal efficiency and fuel types. Experiments were conducted with gasoline and CNG fuels at different compression ratios and mixtures. When CNG was used instead of gasoline in stoichiometric mixture, CO2 emission was reduced by 23% at a brake mean effective pres-sion (BMEP) of 5 bar. Approximately 8% less CO2 was produced when operating with a lean mixture (λ = 1.6) instead of a stoichiometric mixture for both fuels. In the experiments conducted with CNG, CO2 emission decreased by 1.5% when compression ratio was changed from 10.5 to 14. However, as the compression ratio increased, the volumetric efficiency decreased at constant BMEP. Therefore, the efficiency coefficient, which takes into account the effect of volumetric efficiency, was defined and it was observed that thermal efficiency could increase up to 7% by increasing the compression ratio from 10.5 to 14. Finally, when comparing CNG fuel with a high compression ratio (ε = 14) and ultra-lean mixture, and gasoline fuel with a low compression ratio (ε = 10.5) and stoichiometric mixture, it was observed that CO2 emission decreased by around 33%.
AB - Air pollution caused by the exhaust gases of internal combustion engines threatens the future of these machines. CO2, which is normally non-polluting but causes global warming, has necessitated limiting the emission of this gas. Therefore, reducing CO2 production at its source is the most effective method. In particular, the use of fuels with a high H/C ratio, such as compressed natural gas (CNG), signifi-cantly reduces CO2 emission. In this study, the contribution of different mechanisms to CO2 reduction was examined by combining both thermal efficiency and fuel types. Experiments were conducted with gasoline and CNG fuels at different compression ratios and mixtures. When CNG was used instead of gasoline in stoichiometric mixture, CO2 emission was reduced by 23% at a brake mean effective pres-sion (BMEP) of 5 bar. Approximately 8% less CO2 was produced when operating with a lean mixture (λ = 1.6) instead of a stoichiometric mixture for both fuels. In the experiments conducted with CNG, CO2 emission decreased by 1.5% when compression ratio was changed from 10.5 to 14. However, as the compression ratio increased, the volumetric efficiency decreased at constant BMEP. Therefore, the efficiency coefficient, which takes into account the effect of volumetric efficiency, was defined and it was observed that thermal efficiency could increase up to 7% by increasing the compression ratio from 10.5 to 14. Finally, when comparing CNG fuel with a high compression ratio (ε = 14) and ultra-lean mixture, and gasoline fuel with a low compression ratio (ε = 10.5) and stoichiometric mixture, it was observed that CO2 emission decreased by around 33%.
KW - CNG
KW - CO reduction
KW - greenhouse effect
KW - low temperature combustion
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85210258885&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1615/InterJEnerCleanEnv.2024051076
DO - 10.1615/InterJEnerCleanEnv.2024051076
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85210258885
SN - 2150-3621
VL - 26
SP - 111
EP - 126
JO - International Journal of Energy for a Clean Environment
JF - International Journal of Energy for a Clean Environment
IS - 1
ER -