Ana gezinime geç Aramaya geç Ana içeriğe geç

Intelligent Word Embedding Methods to Support Project Proposal Grouping for Project Selection

  • Meltem Yontar Aksoy*
  • , Mehmet Fatih Amasyali
  • , Seda Yanık
  • *Bu çalışma için yazışmadan sorumlu yazar

Araştırma sonucu: Kitap/Rapor/Konferans Bildirisinde BölümKonferans katkısıbilirkişi

1 Atıf (Scopus)

Özet

Project proposal selection for allocating the fund is a critical decision-making process in government/private funding agencies, universities, and research institutes. Project proposal grouping according to their similarities is an essential procedure in the project selection process and is done to simplify the work that follows, such as reviewer assignment and evaluation of projects. Current approaches to grouping proposals are primarily based on manual matching of similar topics, discipline areas, and keywords declared by project applicants. When the number of proposals increases, this task becomes complex and takes too much time. Furthermore, because of their subjective viewpoints and potential misinterpretations, applicants frequently fail to select the correct research field or keywords for their proposals. Due to time constraints, a lack of understanding of the proposal's content, divergent perspectives, and incomplete information, proposals are misclassified, resulting in decreased evaluation quality. This article discusses how to effectively use rich information in the abstract and title of Turkish proposals by utilizing word embedding models. In the proposed method, texts are vectorized using the FastText, BERT and TF-IDF algorithms. The presented method is validated based on the proposals submitted to the Istanbul Development Agency. Experiments indicate that generated word embeddings can effectively represent proposal texts as vectors and be used as input for clustering or classification algorithms. In this way, proposal grouping can be conducted more efficiently, accurately, and without any loss of meaning.

Orijinal dilİngilizce
Ana bilgisayar yayını başlığıIntelligent and Fuzzy Systems - Digital Acceleration and The New Normal - Proceedings of the INFUS 2022 Conference
EditörlerCengiz Kahraman, Sezi Cevik Onar, Basar Oztaysi, Irem Ucal Sari, A. Cagri Tolga, Selcuk Cebi
YayınlayanSpringer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH
Sayfalar990-998
Sayfa sayısı9
ISBN (Basılı)9783031091728
DOI'lar
Yayın durumuYayınlandı - 2022
EtkinlikInternational Conference on Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, INFUS 2022 - Izmir, Turkey
Süre: 19 Tem 202221 Tem 2022

Yayın serisi

AdıLecture Notes in Networks and Systems
Hacim504 LNNS
ISSN (Basılı)2367-3370
ISSN (Elektronik)2367-3389

???event.eventtypes.event.conference???

???event.eventtypes.event.conference???International Conference on Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, INFUS 2022
Ülke/BölgeTurkey
ŞehirIzmir
Periyot19/07/2221/07/22

Bibliyografik not

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

Finansman

Different funding organizations receive project proposals from individuals or institutions for grant allocation within the scope of various financing programs. Project proposals go through the selection and evaluation process. This process evaluates project proposals against the evaluation criteria specified in the financial support program and determines which projects are eligible for grants. Figure 1 illustrates the general project selection process proposed by Rathore et al. [1]. While this workflow is specific to research projects, it is a general methodology for how various funding organizations select projects for grant allocation. The project selection process begins with a call for proposals from any funding organization. Following that, these organizations receive proposals from a variety of individuals and institutions. Additionally, received project proposals are categorized according to the techniques or problems they address. Following categorization, proposals are assigned to numerous experts in the relevant field for evaluation. Experts review and evaluate proposals in accordance with the financing organization’s rules and criteria. The review results are collected and sorted according to various methods [2]. In support of these evaluation results, the panel discusses the proposal’s significance and then makes the final decision. The final decision may include whether proposals are eligible for funding or not, as well as the fund’s maximum size.

Parmak izi

Intelligent Word Embedding Methods to Support Project Proposal Grouping for Project Selection' araştırma başlıklarına git. Birlikte benzersiz bir parmak izi oluştururlar.

Alıntı Yap