TY - JOUR
T1 - Follow-up on assessment of student outcomes by senior-year design project and continuing to improve by performance indicator breakdown-based assessment
AU - Dulekgurgen, Ebru
AU - Yangin-Gomec, Cigdem
AU - Özgün, Özlem Karahan
AU - Aydin, Basak
AU - Guven, Huseyin
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Kassel University Press GmbH 2018. All rights reserved.
PY - 2018
Y1 - 2018
N2 - The study is a follow-up on rubric-based assessment of level of attainment of Student Outcomes (SOs) in Environmental Engineering undergraduate education by the senior-year Graduation Design Project (GDP): the focal points are the process of and results from incorporation of additional assessment tools and implementation of “Performance Indicator (PI)-breakdown” approach to continue improving the SO Assessment and Evaluation (A&E) process. For several consecutive cycles, A&E to define attainment level of total of seven SOs by the GDP gave results below the set thresholds for some of them (SO1,5,8), which indicated a discrepancy and a need for improvement not only in the assessment tools, but also in the A&E processes. Accordingly, two remedial actions were undertaken to meet those needs and the SOs were re-assessed. As the first remedial action, alternative assessment tools were incorporated to the SO A&E process. Assessment results revealed a clear progress in SO attainment, from 2014-15 to 2015-16. However, those lump-sum results still gave a general sense of students' performance at SO-level. Therefore, some additional assessment tools were added and the “PI-breakdown”-based approach was implemented as the second remedial action. Those implementations enabled obtaining more realistic, detailed, and informative results and facilitated further fine tuning of the SO A&E process.
AB - The study is a follow-up on rubric-based assessment of level of attainment of Student Outcomes (SOs) in Environmental Engineering undergraduate education by the senior-year Graduation Design Project (GDP): the focal points are the process of and results from incorporation of additional assessment tools and implementation of “Performance Indicator (PI)-breakdown” approach to continue improving the SO Assessment and Evaluation (A&E) process. For several consecutive cycles, A&E to define attainment level of total of seven SOs by the GDP gave results below the set thresholds for some of them (SO1,5,8), which indicated a discrepancy and a need for improvement not only in the assessment tools, but also in the A&E processes. Accordingly, two remedial actions were undertaken to meet those needs and the SOs were re-assessed. As the first remedial action, alternative assessment tools were incorporated to the SO A&E process. Assessment results revealed a clear progress in SO attainment, from 2014-15 to 2015-16. However, those lump-sum results still gave a general sense of students' performance at SO-level. Therefore, some additional assessment tools were added and the “PI-breakdown”-based approach was implemented as the second remedial action. Those implementations enabled obtaining more realistic, detailed, and informative results and facilitated further fine tuning of the SO A&E process.
KW - Assessment and evaluation (A&E)
KW - Engineering education
KW - Graduation design project
KW - Performance indicator (PI)
KW - Problem/design-based learning
KW - Rubric
KW - Student outcome (SO)
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061824756&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3991/ijep.v8i5.8148
DO - 10.3991/ijep.v8i5.8148
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85061824756
SN - 2192-4880
VL - 8
SP - 19
EP - 28
JO - International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy
JF - International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy
IS - 5
ER -