TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluation of phase change materials used in building components for conservation of energy in buildings in hot dry climatic regions
AU - Köse Murathan, Eda
AU - Manioğlu, Gülten
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2020/12
Y1 - 2020/12
N2 - This study evaluates the effects of the position, thickness and application of PCMs on different building components on a building's energy consumption. In this study, in a three-storey building with a 10 m/30 m sized in Diyarbakır in the hot-dry climatic region was used. In order to reduce the total, cooling, and heating energy loads, different alternatives were created by applying the PCM in the building envelope and inner surfaces of the studied unit. The energy performance was evaluated with the simulation tool EnergyPlus (9.0.1) for every different alternative, operative temperature of the unit for 21st January and 21st July was also calculated. Total energy load of the building was reduced when 5 cm PCM was applied on position 2 on the building envelope. When PCM was applied on inner walls and floors in addition to the building envelope (App4) total energy load of both units and the building was reduced (9.69%). However, in none of the alternatives energy consumptions in the units were equal; only the difference between them could be reduced. With the positive effect of App4 on the operative temperature, U2 was replaced by U5 as the unit with the lowest energy consumption on January 21.
AB - This study evaluates the effects of the position, thickness and application of PCMs on different building components on a building's energy consumption. In this study, in a three-storey building with a 10 m/30 m sized in Diyarbakır in the hot-dry climatic region was used. In order to reduce the total, cooling, and heating energy loads, different alternatives were created by applying the PCM in the building envelope and inner surfaces of the studied unit. The energy performance was evaluated with the simulation tool EnergyPlus (9.0.1) for every different alternative, operative temperature of the unit for 21st January and 21st July was also calculated. Total energy load of the building was reduced when 5 cm PCM was applied on position 2 on the building envelope. When PCM was applied on inner walls and floors in addition to the building envelope (App4) total energy load of both units and the building was reduced (9.69%). However, in none of the alternatives energy consumptions in the units were equal; only the difference between them could be reduced. With the positive effect of App4 on the operative temperature, U2 was replaced by U5 as the unit with the lowest energy consumption on January 21.
KW - Building envelope
KW - Cooling energy consumption
KW - Heating energy consumption
KW - Hot-dry climatic region
KW - Phase-change material
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85092252222&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.renene.2020.09.086
DO - 10.1016/j.renene.2020.09.086
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85092252222
SN - 0960-1481
VL - 162
SP - 1919
EP - 1930
JO - Renewable Energy
JF - Renewable Energy
ER -