TY - JOUR
T1 - Environmental impact of sewage sludge co-digestion with food waste and fat-oil-grease
T2 - Integrating plant-wide modeling with life cycle assessment approach
AU - Daskiran, Filiz
AU - Gulhan, Hazal
AU - Kara, Emircan
AU - Guven, Huseyin
AU - Ozgun, Hale
AU - Ersahin, Mustafa Evren
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2024/2
Y1 - 2024/2
N2 - Anaerobic co-digestion of fat-oil-grease (FOG) and food waste (FW) with sewage sludge (SS) in wastewater treatment plants is a method used to increase biogas production. In this study, digestion scenarios were compared using plant-wide modeling and life cycle assessment: Scenario-0 (mono-digestion of waste-activated sludge (WAS)), Scenario-1 (co-digestion of WAS with FOG), and Scenario-2 (co-digestion of WAS with FW). Scenario-0, with the highest energy use and landfilling of FOG/FW, has the worst environmental impact. Scenario-1 and Scenario-2 minimize the environmental load by energy recovery and avoiding landfilling of organic waste. Scenario-wise, the change in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from treatment was negligible. However, due to the impact of landfilling, GHG emissions in Scenario-0 were 21% and 30% higher than in Scenario-1 and 2, respectively. The environmental benefit of anaerobic co-digestion of FOG/FW with SS is not only in the contribution to energy production but also in the recycling of organic waste.
AB - Anaerobic co-digestion of fat-oil-grease (FOG) and food waste (FW) with sewage sludge (SS) in wastewater treatment plants is a method used to increase biogas production. In this study, digestion scenarios were compared using plant-wide modeling and life cycle assessment: Scenario-0 (mono-digestion of waste-activated sludge (WAS)), Scenario-1 (co-digestion of WAS with FOG), and Scenario-2 (co-digestion of WAS with FW). Scenario-0, with the highest energy use and landfilling of FOG/FW, has the worst environmental impact. Scenario-1 and Scenario-2 minimize the environmental load by energy recovery and avoiding landfilling of organic waste. Scenario-wise, the change in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from treatment was negligible. However, due to the impact of landfilling, GHG emissions in Scenario-0 were 21% and 30% higher than in Scenario-1 and 2, respectively. The environmental benefit of anaerobic co-digestion of FOG/FW with SS is not only in the contribution to energy production but also in the recycling of organic waste.
KW - Anaerobic co-digestion
KW - Biological modeling
KW - Environmental assessment
KW - Landfilling
KW - Organic waste
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85180558758&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.biortech.2023.130198
DO - 10.1016/j.biortech.2023.130198
M3 - Article
C2 - 38103751
AN - SCOPUS:85180558758
SN - 0960-8524
VL - 394
JO - Bioresource Technology
JF - Bioresource Technology
M1 - 130198
ER -