Critical Comparison of Phase-Field, Peridynamics, and Crack Band Model M7 in Light of Gap Test and Classical Fracture Tests

Keyphrases

• Gap Test 100%
• Peridynamics 100%
• Crack Band Model 100%
• Phase Field 100%
• Fracture Test 100%
• Fracture Process Zone 66%
• Plastic Hardening 66%
• Tensorial 66%
• Metal Matrix Composites 33%
• Sandstone 33%
• Superior Performance 33%
• Fracture Problems 33%
• Shale 33%
• Size Effect 33%
• Fracture Energy 33%
• Fiber Composites 33%
• Bond-based 33%
• Peridynamic Model 33%
• Classical Test Theory 33%
• Simple Test 33%
• Misfit 33%
• Damage Behavior 33%
• Sub-micrometer 33%
• State-based 33%
• Microplane 33%
• Skipping 33%
• Finite Width 33%
• Phase-field Model 33%
• Crack Process 33%
• Bond-associated 33%
• Damage Constitutive 33%
• Deformation Gradient 33%
• Finite Length 33%
• Lattice Microstructures 33%
• Composite Plastics 33%
• Theory Critique 33%
• Particle Rotation 33%
• Lattice Discrete Particle Model 33%

Engineering

• Peridynamics 100%
• Band Model 100%
• Phase Field 100%
• Process Zone 66%
• Size Effect 33%
• Crack Face 33%
• Fracture Energy 33%
• Finite Length 33%
• Composite Fiber 33%
• Latest Version 33%
• Practical Problem 33%
• Field Model 33%
• Peridynamic Model 33%
• Damage Behavior 33%
• Deformation Gradient 33%

Material Science

• Composite Material 100%
• Fracture Toughness Testing 100%
• Phase Field Model 50%