Comparison of relative INAA and k0-INAA using proficiency test materials at ITU TRIGA Mark II research reactor

Ayse Nur Esen; Sevilay Haciyakupoglu; Sema Erenturk

doi:10.1007/s10967-017-5669-0

Comparison of relative INAA and k0-INAA using proficiency test materials at ITU TRIGA Mark II research reactor

Ayse Nur Esen^*, Sevilay Haciyakupoglu, Sema Erenturk

^*Bu çalışma için yazışmadan sorumlu yazar

Enerji Enstitüsü

Istanbul Bilgi University

Araştırma sonucu: Dergiye katkı › Makale › bilirkişi

4 Atıf (Scopus)

Özet

Proficiency testing is an important way of evaluating the analytical method used in the laboratory. In recent years, neutron activation analysis studies performed in ITU TRIGA Mark II reactor comprised five proficiency tests organized by Wageningen evaluating programs for analytical laboratories. In this study, the results obtained by relative INAA and k₀-INAA method for 16 elements in soil and plant samples are presented. Since both methods have some advantages compared to each other, the possible approach for the laboratory should be to combine relative INAA and k₀-INAA results.

Orijinal dil	İngilizce
Sayfa (başlangıç-bitiş)	677-683
Sayfa sayısı	7
Dergi	Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry
Hacim	315
Basın numarası	3
DOI'lar	https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-017-5669-0
Yayın durumu	Yayınlandı - 1 Mar 2018

Bibliyografik not

Publisher Copyright:
© 2017, Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary.

Finansman

Acknowledgements The authors are thankful to International Atomic Energy Agency for their support under regional TC RER 1/007 project and to Czech Academy of Sciences (CAS) and Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) that supported the Joint Research and Development Project (TUBITAK Project No: 212T190) on k0-INAA studies at ITU TRIGA Mark II reactor.

Finansörler	Finansör numarası
Joint Research and Development Project	212T190
TUBITAK
International Technological University
Akademie Věd České Republiky
Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştirma Kurumu
International Atomic Energy Agency	TC RER 1/007

Belgeye Erişim

10.1007/s10967-017-5669-0

Diğer Dosyalar ve Linkler

Link to publication in Scopus

Alıntı Yap

@article{a98396a18ad24ede941c41a227f9f22c,

title = "Comparison of relative INAA and k0-INAA using proficiency test materials at ITU TRIGA Mark II research reactor",

abstract = "Proficiency testing is an important way of evaluating the analytical method used in the laboratory. In recent years, neutron activation analysis studies performed in ITU TRIGA Mark II reactor comprised five proficiency tests organized by Wageningen evaluating programs for analytical laboratories. In this study, the results obtained by relative INAA and k0-INAA method for 16 elements in soil and plant samples are presented. Since both methods have some advantages compared to each other, the possible approach for the laboratory should be to combine relative INAA and k0-INAA results.",

keywords = "INAA, Plant, Proficiency testing, Soil, TRIGA, WEPAL",

author = "Esen, {Ayse Nur} and Sevilay Haciyakupoglu and Sema Erenturk",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2017, Akad{\'e}miai Kiad{\'o}, Budapest, Hungary.",

year = "2018",

month = mar,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1007/s10967-017-5669-0",

language = "English",

volume = "315",

pages = "677--683",

journal = "Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry",

issn = "0236-5731",

publisher = "Akademiai Kiado ZRt.",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of relative INAA and k0-INAA using proficiency test materials at ITU TRIGA Mark II research reactor

AU - Esen, Ayse Nur

AU - Haciyakupoglu, Sevilay

AU - Erenturk, Sema

PY - 2018/3/1

Y1 - 2018/3/1

N2 - Proficiency testing is an important way of evaluating the analytical method used in the laboratory. In recent years, neutron activation analysis studies performed in ITU TRIGA Mark II reactor comprised five proficiency tests organized by Wageningen evaluating programs for analytical laboratories. In this study, the results obtained by relative INAA and k0-INAA method for 16 elements in soil and plant samples are presented. Since both methods have some advantages compared to each other, the possible approach for the laboratory should be to combine relative INAA and k0-INAA results.

AB - Proficiency testing is an important way of evaluating the analytical method used in the laboratory. In recent years, neutron activation analysis studies performed in ITU TRIGA Mark II reactor comprised five proficiency tests organized by Wageningen evaluating programs for analytical laboratories. In this study, the results obtained by relative INAA and k0-INAA method for 16 elements in soil and plant samples are presented. Since both methods have some advantages compared to each other, the possible approach for the laboratory should be to combine relative INAA and k0-INAA results.

KW - INAA

KW - Plant

KW - Proficiency testing

KW - Soil

KW - TRIGA

KW - WEPAL

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85039840554&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10967-017-5669-0

DO - 10.1007/s10967-017-5669-0

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85039840554

SN - 0236-5731

VL - 315

SP - 677

EP - 683

JO - Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry

JF - Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry

IS - 3

ER -

Comparison of relative INAA and k0-INAA using proficiency test materials at ITU TRIGA Mark II research reactor

Özet

Bibliyografik not

Finansman

Belgeye Erişim

Diğer Dosyalar ve Linkler

Parmak izi

Alıntı Yap