Classical and innovative-Şen trend assessment under climate change perspective

Ismail Dabanli*, Zekâi Şen

*Bu çalışma için yazışmadan sorumlu yazar

Araştırma sonucu: ???type-name???Makalebilirkişi

21 Atıf (Scopus)

Özet

The main purpose of this paper is to provide a comparison between the innovative-Şen and classical trend methods. Additionally, significance levels at ±5% and ±10% levels are suggested for the first time on the innovative-Şen trend template, which works with the categorisation of given data into a set of classes such as 'low', 'medium' and 'high' values. However, the classical approaches consider holistic monotonic trend identification without categorisation. Classical trend analyses methods, Mann-Kendall trend test coupled with, Şen's slope and the classical regression line, are based on a set of restrictive assumptions, but the innovative-Şen approach does not have assumptions. Application of classical methods do not present significant trend component, however, the innovative-Şen trend method provides possible trend components in each cluster within the significance limits. Although the classical approaches do not indicate a significant trend, but innovative-Şen approach provides some categorically significant trends in detail and quantitative information.

Orijinal dilİngilizce
Sayfa (başlangıç-bitiş)19-37
Sayfa sayısı19
DergiInternational Journal of Global Warming
Hacim15
Basın numarası1
DOI'lar
Yayın durumuYayınlandı - 2018
Harici olarak yayınlandıEvet

Bibliyografik not

Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2018 Inderscience Enterprises Ltd.

Parmak izi

Classical and innovative-Şen trend assessment under climate change perspective' araştırma başlıklarına git. Birlikte benzersiz bir parmak izi oluştururlar.

Alıntı Yap