Özet
This article aims to demonstrate the tension inherent within the Turkish opposition between those favoring technocratic anti-populism and/or pragmatic politics and those calling for a passionate and resolute anti-AKP platform seeking revenge. These competing inclinations offer alternate anti-populist platforms and ‘styles.’ The article asks whehter opposition to a populist regime inherently generates an anti-populist platform that ideologically confronts it. The article examines three contenders to President Erdoğan as representatives of three alternative anti-populist styles. It also reflects on the debates among various public intellectuals around the ways to electorally defeat populism.
| Orijinal dil | İngilizce |
|---|---|
| Sayfa (başlangıç-bitiş) | 499-528 |
| Sayfa sayısı | 30 |
| Dergi | Turkish Studies |
| Hacim | 23 |
| Basın numarası | 4 |
| DOI'lar | |
| Yayın durumu | Yayınlandı - 2022 |
Bibliyografik not
Publisher Copyright:© 2022 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
Finansman
Until 2010, the CHP was headed by Deniz Baykal, who was supported by the party’s Kemalist establishment. Adhering to the nationalist-statist creed, Baykal had been resolute in his hostility toward the sectarian and ethnic networks active within the party as well as their left-leaning identity politics. As Ciddi and Esen observed, ‘Baykal did not use his … opportunity to rebuild the CHP into a mass organization that was able to match the AKP electoral machine.’ On the contrary, ‘Baykal’s CHP continued to wage the cultural war of the 1990s [which] restricted the party’s support to a minority group … whereas the AKP, no doubt taking advantage of its access to state resources, became a catch-all party.’
Parmak izi
Between technocracy, reason, and furor: Turkish opposition, the CHP, and anti-populist styles' araştırma başlıklarına git. Birlikte benzersiz bir parmak izi oluştururlar.Alıntı Yap
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver