A multi-criteria decision framework for IP valuation method selection: “Valuation case” matters

Aysun Beyazkilic Koc, Nihan Yildirim*

*Bu çalışma için yazışmadan sorumlu yazar

Araştırma sonucu: ???type-name???Makalebilirkişi

2 Atıf (Scopus)

Özet

This paper explores the applicability of IP (Intellectual Property) valuation methods in the university TTOs context by using multi-criteria decision-making frameworks. The IP valuation methods are evaluated for their usage in university IP and Startup valuation, patent or patent-pending technologies, and different Technology Readiness Levels (TRLs). Data was collected through in-depth structured interviews and a Delphi survey with 17 experts. By descriptive analysis of responses and consensus rates, we proposed a combined multi-criteria decision-making model of Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) for university Technology Transfer Offices (TTOs) to be utilized in selecting appropriate IP Valuation methods. Findings reveal that more than one method should be used to make well-supported estimates for patent value. DCF method is the most suggested method. Income methods are most favourable on University IP, Startup's IP, non–patented or patent-pending, TRL 1–6 technologies. Findings can help valuation practitioners, especially from TTOs, design roadmaps for IP valuation.

Orijinal dilİngilizce
Makale numarası102176
DergiWorld Patent Information
Hacim73
DOI'lar
Yayın durumuYayınlandı - Haz 2023

Bibliyografik not

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023

Finansman

This research was supported by Scientific Research Unit (BAP) of Istanbul Technical University .

FinansörlerFinansör numarası
Istanbul Teknik Üniversitesi

    Parmak izi

    A multi-criteria decision framework for IP valuation method selection: “Valuation case” matters' araştırma başlıklarına git. Birlikte benzersiz bir parmak izi oluştururlar.

    Alıntı Yap