Ana gezinime geç Aramaya geç Ana içeriğe geç

A comparison of fuzzy multicriteria decision making methods for intelligent building assessment

  • Ihsan Kaya*
  • , Cengiz Kahraman
  • *Bu çalışma için yazışmadan sorumlu yazar
  • Yildiz Technical University

Araştırma sonucu: Dergiye katkıMakalebilirkişi

64 Atıf (Scopus)

Özet

The methodology, Multicriteria Decision Making (MCDM), refers to finding the best alternative from all of the feasible alternatives in the presence of multiple, usually conflicting, decision criteria. Nowadays, intelligent buildings performance that is increasingly evidenced in building design and construction has been analyzed by using MCDM techniques. Intelligent buildings (IBs) are also under assessment according to their IB related characteristics and actual circumstances as a MCDM problem. In this paper, two most known MCDM methodologies, Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and TOPSIS (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution), are used for intelligent building assessment under fuzzy environment for dealing with the evaluations uncertainty and imprecision in which the expert's comparisons that are represented as fuzzy numbers. For this aim, three intelligent building alternatives for a business centre in Istanbul are evaluated by using these two fuzzy MCDM methods and the obtained ranking results are compared. © 2014

Orijinal dilİngilizce
Sayfa (başlangıç-bitiş)59-69
Sayfa sayısı11
DergiJournal of Civil Engineering and Management
Hacim20
Basın numarası1
DOI'lar
Yayın durumuYayınlandı - 2014

Parmak izi

A comparison of fuzzy multicriteria decision making methods for intelligent building assessment' araştırma başlıklarına git. Birlikte benzersiz bir parmak izi oluştururlar.

Alıntı Yap