Abstract
Among Wittgenstein’s thought experiments, the wood-sellers is one of the most controversial. According to an absolutist interpretation, they are meant to show that we cannot transcend our concepts, and that our rationality is the only possible one. In contrast, according to a relativist interpretation, they are meant to expose the parochialism of our concepts and the contingency of our logic. In this paper, I will attempt to move beyond absolutism and relativism, and I will explore the possibility of a relativistic (as opposed to relativist) reading of the wood-sellers. So, like Carlo Penco, I will use Einstein’s theory of relativity in order to throw some light on them. Yet, I will also contend that Penco’s interpretation falls short of a truly relativistic reading of Wittgenstein.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 320-330 |
Number of pages | 11 |
Journal | International Journal of Philosophical Studies |
Volume | 29 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2021 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2021 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
Keywords
- Carlo Penco
- Einstein
- relativism
- relativity
- Wittgenstein
- wood-sellers