TY - JOUR
T1 - Watching (De)Intercalation of 2D Metals in Epitaxial Graphene
T2 - Insight into the Role of Defects
AU - Niefind, Falk
AU - Mao, Qian
AU - Nayir, Nadire
AU - Kowalik, Malgorzata
AU - Ahn, Jung Joon
AU - Winchester, Andrew J.
AU - Dong, Chengye
AU - Maniyara, Rinu A.
AU - Robinson, Joshua A.
AU - van Duin, Adri C.T.
AU - Pookpanratana, Sujitra
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Wiley-VCH GmbH.
PY - 2024/3/15
Y1 - 2024/3/15
N2 - Intercalation forms heterostructures, and over 25 elements and compounds are intercalated into graphene, but the mechanism for this process is not well understood. Here, the de-intercalation of 2D Ag and Ga metals sandwiched between bilayer graphene and SiC are followed using photoemission electron microscopy (PEEM) and atomistic-scale reactive molecular dynamics simulations. By PEEM, de-intercalation “windows” (or defects) are observed in both systems, but the processes follow distinctly different dynamics. Reversible de- and re-intercalation of Ag is observed through a circular defect where the intercalation velocity front is 0.5 nm s−1 ± 0.2 nm s.−1 In contrast, the de-intercalation of Ga is irreversible with faster kinetics that are influenced by the non-circular shape of the defect. Molecular dynamics simulations support these pronounced differences and complexities between the two Ag and Ga systems. In the de-intercalating Ga model, Ga atoms first pile up between graphene layers until ultimately moving to the graphene surface. The simulations, supported by density functional theory, indicate that the Ga atoms exhibit larger binding strength to graphene, which agrees with the faster and irreversible diffusion kinetics observed. Thus, both the thermophysical properties of the metal intercalant and its interaction with defective graphene play a key role in intercalation.
AB - Intercalation forms heterostructures, and over 25 elements and compounds are intercalated into graphene, but the mechanism for this process is not well understood. Here, the de-intercalation of 2D Ag and Ga metals sandwiched between bilayer graphene and SiC are followed using photoemission electron microscopy (PEEM) and atomistic-scale reactive molecular dynamics simulations. By PEEM, de-intercalation “windows” (or defects) are observed in both systems, but the processes follow distinctly different dynamics. Reversible de- and re-intercalation of Ag is observed through a circular defect where the intercalation velocity front is 0.5 nm s−1 ± 0.2 nm s.−1 In contrast, the de-intercalation of Ga is irreversible with faster kinetics that are influenced by the non-circular shape of the defect. Molecular dynamics simulations support these pronounced differences and complexities between the two Ag and Ga systems. In the de-intercalating Ga model, Ga atoms first pile up between graphene layers until ultimately moving to the graphene surface. The simulations, supported by density functional theory, indicate that the Ga atoms exhibit larger binding strength to graphene, which agrees with the faster and irreversible diffusion kinetics observed. Thus, both the thermophysical properties of the metal intercalant and its interaction with defective graphene play a key role in intercalation.
KW - defects
KW - dynamics
KW - graphene
KW - intercalation
KW - molecular dynamics
KW - photoemission electron microscopy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85175378048&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/smll.202306554
DO - 10.1002/smll.202306554
M3 - Article
C2 - 37919862
AN - SCOPUS:85175378048
SN - 1613-6810
VL - 20
JO - Small
JF - Small
IS - 11
M1 - 2306554
ER -