Voting games of resolute social choice correspondences

Sinan Ertemel*, Levent Kutlu, M.  Remzi Sanver

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

A resolute social choice correspondence is a social choice rule which maps preference profiles into sets of mutually compatible outcomes. We consider a fairly large class of resolute social choice correspondences and characterize the strong Nash equilibrium outcomes of their voting games in terms of a generalization of the Condorcet principle. Our findings generalize those of Sertel and Sanver (Soc Choice Welf 22:331–347, 2004) who address the same question in a more restricted framework.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)187-201
Number of pages15
JournalSocial Choice and Welfare
Volume45
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 23 Jun 2015

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2015, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Voting games of resolute social choice correspondences'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this