Uniqueness of stationary equilibrium payoffs in coalitional bargaining

Hülya Eraslan, Andrew McLennan*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

40 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We study a model of sequential bargaining in which, in each period before an agreement is reached, the proposer's identity is randomly determined, the proposer suggests a division of a pie of size one, each other agent either approves or rejects the proposal, and the proposal is implemented if the set of approving agents is a winning coalition for the proposer. The theory of the fixed point index is used to show that stationary equilibrium expected payoffs of this coalitional bargaining game are unique. This generalizes Eraslan [34] insofar as: (a) there are no restrictions on the structure of sets of winning coalitions; (b) different proposers may have different sets of winning coalitions; (c) there may be a positive probability that no proposer is selected.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2195-2222
Number of pages28
JournalJournal of Economic Theory
Volume148
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2013
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Coalitions
  • Fixed point index
  • Fixed points
  • Legislative bargaining
  • Multilateral bargaining
  • Noncooperative bargaining
  • Simple games
  • TU games

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Uniqueness of stationary equilibrium payoffs in coalitional bargaining'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this