Turkish parliamentary debates about the international recognition of the Armenian genocide: development and variations in the official denialism

Türkay Salim Nefes; Doğan Gürpınar; Özgür Kaymak

doi:10.1080/14683857.2022.2149042

Turkish parliamentary debates about the international recognition of the Armenian genocide: development and variations in the official denialism

Türkay Salim Nefes^*, Doğan Gürpınar, Özgür Kaymak

^*Corresponding author for this work

Department of Sociology

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The main source of animosity in modern Turkish–Armenian relations is the debate on the international recognition of the Armenian genocide. To provide an evidence-based and thorough perspective on the Turkish political stance in this discussion, this article explores all the relevant speeches in Turkish parliamentary records. It pays particular attention to political parties’ stances, the historical evolution of the debate, and the significance of the individual profiles of parliamentarians who contributed to the discussion. The findings show that most political parties in Turkey articulated versions of denial, except for a few marginal anti-denial voices. The study concludes that while political parties’ ideological orientations predominantly shape the Turkish debate on the international recognition of the Armenian genocide, historical contexts, local memories, and the individual backgrounds of parliamentarians seem to inspire minor variations in their tones.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	883-899
Number of pages	17
Journal	Southeast European and Black Sea Studies
Volume	23
Issue number	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1080/14683857.2022.2149042
Publication status	Published - 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Funding

The work was supported by the Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian [254570]. This research was made possible by a Gulbenkian Foundation research grant (ref: 254570). Dr Nefes also acknowledges his gratefulness for the Ramon y Cajal Research grant (ref: RYC2018-023919-I), which provided him to time to work on this study. Last, this article benefited greatly from the valuable comments of two anonymous reviewers. This research was made possible by a Gulbenkian Foundation research grant (ref: 254570). Dr Nefes also acknowledges his gratefulness for the Ramon y Cajal Research grant (ref: RYC2018-023919-I), which provided him to time to work on this study. Last, this article benefited greatly from the valuable comments of two anonymous reviewers.

Funders	Funder number
Gulbenkian Foundation	254570
Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian

Keywords

Denialism
Turkey
Turkish nationalism
parliament
the Armenian genocide

Access to Document

10.1080/14683857.2022.2149042

Cite this

@article{9322fe54a85c4c4aa99c6944347a64a8,

title = "Turkish parliamentary debates about the international recognition of the Armenian genocide: development and variations in the official denialism",

abstract = "The main source of animosity in modern Turkish–Armenian relations is the debate on the international recognition of the Armenian genocide. To provide an evidence-based and thorough perspective on the Turkish political stance in this discussion, this article explores all the relevant speeches in Turkish parliamentary records. It pays particular attention to political parties{\textquoteright} stances, the historical evolution of the debate, and the significance of the individual profiles of parliamentarians who contributed to the discussion. The findings show that most political parties in Turkey articulated versions of denial, except for a few marginal anti-denial voices. The study concludes that while political parties{\textquoteright} ideological orientations predominantly shape the Turkish debate on the international recognition of the Armenian genocide, historical contexts, local memories, and the individual backgrounds of parliamentarians seem to inspire minor variations in their tones.",

keywords = "Denialism, Turkey, Turkish nationalism, parliament, the Armenian genocide",

author = "Nefes, {T{\"u}rkay Salim} and Doğan G{\"u}rpınar and {\"O}zg{\"u}r Kaymak",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.",

year = "2023",

doi = "10.1080/14683857.2022.2149042",

language = "English",

volume = "23",

pages = "883--899",

journal = "Southeast European and Black Sea Studies",

issn = "1468-3857",

publisher = "Routledge",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Turkish parliamentary debates about the international recognition of the Armenian genocide

T2 - development and variations in the official denialism

AU - Nefes, Türkay Salim

AU - Gürpınar, Doğan

AU - Kaymak, Özgür

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

N2 - The main source of animosity in modern Turkish–Armenian relations is the debate on the international recognition of the Armenian genocide. To provide an evidence-based and thorough perspective on the Turkish political stance in this discussion, this article explores all the relevant speeches in Turkish parliamentary records. It pays particular attention to political parties’ stances, the historical evolution of the debate, and the significance of the individual profiles of parliamentarians who contributed to the discussion. The findings show that most political parties in Turkey articulated versions of denial, except for a few marginal anti-denial voices. The study concludes that while political parties’ ideological orientations predominantly shape the Turkish debate on the international recognition of the Armenian genocide, historical contexts, local memories, and the individual backgrounds of parliamentarians seem to inspire minor variations in their tones.

AB - The main source of animosity in modern Turkish–Armenian relations is the debate on the international recognition of the Armenian genocide. To provide an evidence-based and thorough perspective on the Turkish political stance in this discussion, this article explores all the relevant speeches in Turkish parliamentary records. It pays particular attention to political parties’ stances, the historical evolution of the debate, and the significance of the individual profiles of parliamentarians who contributed to the discussion. The findings show that most political parties in Turkey articulated versions of denial, except for a few marginal anti-denial voices. The study concludes that while political parties’ ideological orientations predominantly shape the Turkish debate on the international recognition of the Armenian genocide, historical contexts, local memories, and the individual backgrounds of parliamentarians seem to inspire minor variations in their tones.

KW - Denialism

KW - Turkey

KW - Turkish nationalism

KW - parliament

KW - the Armenian genocide

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85142381143&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/14683857.2022.2149042

DO - 10.1080/14683857.2022.2149042

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85142381143

SN - 1468-3857

VL - 23

SP - 883

EP - 899

JO - Southeast European and Black Sea Studies

JF - Southeast European and Black Sea Studies

IS - 4

ER -

Turkish parliamentary debates about the international recognition of the Armenian genocide: development and variations in the official denialism

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Funding

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this