Abstract
This work presents a comparison between different tuning methods for cascade PI(D) controller parameters of the permanent magnet direct current (PMDC) motor drives. First, the classical method (CM) for cascade PI(D) tuning is explained and applied. It has been shown that the classical tuning approach requires some assumptions. Next, a heuristic optimization technique, the Bacterial Foraging Algorithm (BFA), has been introduced and implemented for the problem. Lastly, for the comparison, the Genetic Algorithm (GA) is applied for the cascade PI(D) tuning problem. The results for these three methods are compared and discussed. It is shown that the controller designed by BFA showed better dynamic performance.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | ELECO 2015 - 9th International Conference on Electrical and Electronics Engineering |
| Publisher | Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. |
| Pages | 1061-1066 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9786050107371 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 28 Jan 2016 |
| Event | 9th International Conference on Electrical and Electronics Engineering, ELECO 2015 - Bursa, Turkey Duration: 26 Nov 2015 → 28 Nov 2015 |
Publication series
| Name | ELECO 2015 - 9th International Conference on Electrical and Electronics Engineering |
|---|
Conference
| Conference | 9th International Conference on Electrical and Electronics Engineering, ELECO 2015 |
|---|---|
| Country/Territory | Turkey |
| City | Bursa |
| Period | 26/11/15 → 28/11/15 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2015 Chamber of Electrical Engineers of Turkey.
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Tuning cascade PI(D) controllers in PMDC motor drives: A performance comparison for different types of tuning methods'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver