Tuning cascade PI(D) controllers in PMDC motor drives: A performance comparison for different types of tuning methods

Taha Nurettin Gücin, Muhammet Biberoǧlu, Bekir Fincan, Mehmet Onur Gülbahçe

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This work presents a comparison between different tuning methods for cascade PI(D) controller parameters of the permanent magnet direct current (PMDC) motor drives. First, the classical method (CM) for cascade PI(D) tuning is explained and applied. It has been shown that the classical tuning approach requires some assumptions. Next, a heuristic optimization technique, the Bacterial Foraging Algorithm (BFA), has been introduced and implemented for the problem. Lastly, for the comparison, the Genetic Algorithm (GA) is applied for the cascade PI(D) tuning problem. The results for these three methods are compared and discussed. It is shown that the controller designed by BFA showed better dynamic performance.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationELECO 2015 - 9th International Conference on Electrical and Electronics Engineering
PublisherInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
Pages1061-1066
Number of pages6
ISBN (Electronic)9786050107371
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 28 Jan 2016
Event9th International Conference on Electrical and Electronics Engineering, ELECO 2015 - Bursa, Turkey
Duration: 26 Nov 201528 Nov 2015

Publication series

NameELECO 2015 - 9th International Conference on Electrical and Electronics Engineering

Conference

Conference9th International Conference on Electrical and Electronics Engineering, ELECO 2015
Country/TerritoryTurkey
CityBursa
Period26/11/1528/11/15

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Chamber of Electrical Engineers of Turkey.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Tuning cascade PI(D) controllers in PMDC motor drives: A performance comparison for different types of tuning methods'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this