The resurrection of earlier imprints post mortem: Explaining the Turkish agricultural cooperative movement with an imprinting theory lens, 1888–1937

Cemil Ozan Soydemir*, Mehmet Erçek

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This study aims to extend the cooperative lifecycle theory, which builds on consecutive degeneration and regeneration of ideal cooperative values such as democracy, self-help, and solidarity by offering a new regenerative mechanism. In this respect, the study imports multilevel imprinting theory from the organizational ecology domain to explicate the punctuated evolutionary pattern of Turkish agricultural credit cooperatives, which displayed significantly different characteristics from Raiffeisen cooperatives that cooperative discourse in Türkiye used for a long as a benchmark. The archival research undertaken in the study asserts that the imprints of Ottoman Memleket Sandiks (OMS) have stamped agricultural credit cooperatives of the Republican era long after their erosion. The resurrection of imprints was enabled by Ziraat Bank, which acted as an intermediary organization and took over the remnants of OMSs. Our analyses also suggest that the State's polity and policy transformations culminate in selective activation of past imprints within the Ziraat Bank, which, in turn, shaped the Turkish agricultural cooperative field.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1199-1232
Number of pages34
JournalAnnals of Public and Cooperative Economics
Volume94
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Edgard Milhaud Foundation.

Keywords

  • agricultural credit cooperatives
  • hermeneutical discourse analysis
  • imprinting
  • life cycle theory
  • regeneration

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The resurrection of earlier imprints post mortem: Explaining the Turkish agricultural cooperative movement with an imprinting theory lens, 1888–1937'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this