Abstract
In this study, seismic fragility analysis of multi-span steel truss bridges still giving service in railway network of Turkey was aimed. For this purpose, two representative multi-span steel truss bridges were selected in Turkish railway lines. A detailed three-dimensional inelastic finite element (FE) model for each bridge was created using commercial FE software. These models were used to perform non-linear time history analyses for each of the selected 30 ground motions scaled to 10 different peak ground acceleration (PGA) values to assess seismic demands of the bridges. To develop fragility curves, probabilistic seismic demand models (PSDMs) were defined. The most appropriate ground motion intensity measure (IM) for PSDMs of both bridges was determined among 11 IMs and the PGA was found as the optimal IM. Finally, the fragility curves for both the components and structural systems of the bridges were developed. The results clearly showed that the multi-span continuous (MSC) steel truss bridge is more vulnerable than the multi-span simply supported (MSSS) steel truss bridge, and for both bridge types, steel bearings are the most vulnerable components. Additionally, top wind braces for the MSC bridge as well as transverse beams and truss vertical members for the MSSS bridge were found as the most vulnerable superstructure members.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 420-437 |
| Number of pages | 18 |
| Journal | Structure and Infrastructure Engineering |
| Volume | 19 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2022 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2021 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
Funding
The authors greatly appreciate this support and opportunity. The additional valuable support provided by the Turkish Railways Administration (TCDD) during this research project is also gratefully acknowledged. The opinions and results presented in this paper are those of the authors and do not reflect the views of the supporting agencies absolutely. The presented research was supported by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) having Project No. 114M332. The authors greatly appreciate this support and opportunity. The additional valuable support provided by the Turkish Railways Administration (TCDD) during this research project is also gratefully acknowledged. The opinions and results presented in this paper are those of the authors and do not reflect the views of the supporting agencies absolutely.
| Funders | Funder number |
|---|---|
| Turkish Railways Administration | |
| Texas Council for Developmental Disabilities | |
| Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma Kurumu | 114M332 |
Keywords
- Steel railway bridge
- engineering demand parameter
- fragility analysis
- intensity measure
- non-linear time history analysis
- probabilistic seismic demand model
- steel bearing
