RISK PERCEPTION IN THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY: A BIBLIOMETRIC REVIEW

Aynur Hurriyet Turkyilmaz, Gul Polat, Asli Pelin Gurgun

Research output: Contribution to journalConference articlepeer-review

Abstract

This study presents a bibliometric analysis of the existing literature on risk perception in the construction industry. The aims are to discover patterns, significant topics, and the progression of research on risk perception. The study includes academic publications, such as journal articles, conference papers, and book chapters. The data was acquired from articles indexed on Scopus. VOSviewer was utilized to construct a co-occurrence network using the bibliographic data acquired, and a Sankey diagram was formed to investigate publication trends. Four major study clusters were found, encompassing risk management, safety, construction workers, and prevention actions, all within the context of risk perception in construction research. The current rising research topics related to risk perception in construction are occupational and project safety, construction workers, and human resources. The outcomes of this study can provide comprehension of risk perception in construction and research direction by emphasizing the importance of integrating management, safety, workers, and prevention action perspectives while offering new areas for further exploration regarding risk perception in the construction industry.

Original languageEnglish
JournalProceedings of International Structural Engineering and Construction
Volume11
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2024
Event1st Latin American Conference in Structural Engineering and Construction, LATAM-SEC 2024 - Quito, Ecuador
Duration: 4 Mar 20248 Mar 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 ISEC Press.

Keywords

  • Construction management
  • Construction projects
  • Risk assessment
  • Risk management

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'RISK PERCEPTION IN THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY: A BIBLIOMETRIC REVIEW'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this