Revisiting the Impact Evaluation of Women’s Empowerment: A MCDM-Based Evaluation Indicator Selection Framework Proposal

Nihan Yıldırım; Fatma Köroğlu

doi:10.1007/s11205-023-03302-7

Revisiting the Impact Evaluation of Women’s Empowerment: A MCDM-Based Evaluation Indicator Selection Framework Proposal

Nihan Yıldırım^*, Fatma Köroğlu

^*Corresponding author for this work

Department of Management Engineering

Istanbul Technical University

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Women’s empowerment programs play a critical role in achieving the United Nations’ (UN’s) sustainable development goal of “Gender Equality”. However, non-profit organizations (NPOs) running women’s empowerment (WE) programs face challenges in monitoring, assessing, and evaluating the social impact (SI) and program performance due to the lack of solid guidelines. This study aims to analyze the impact and outcome evaluation indicators of WE programs by providing a quantitative tool. A multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) model is proposed to identify and prioritize the performance indicators by utilizing Fuzzy TOPSIS (FTOPSIS) and Fuzzy AHP (FAHP) in a combined methodology. Results validated the identification and classification of the indicators by their importance and viability. In a qualitative study with NPOs working on WE in Turkey, social impact and outcome evaluation indicators are defined and ranked by criteria set in the proposed combined MCDM framework. The study aims to contribute to the theoretical frameworks and practices on social impact and outcome evaluation of women’s empowerment.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	121-145
Number of pages	25
Journal	Social Indicators Research
Volume	172
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-023-03302-7
Publication status	Published - Mar 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2024.

Funding

This study is a product of the Social Impact Analysis of BPFC Project Nr 9801 funded by the sponsorship of IDEMA International and hosted by ITUNOVA TTO A. Ş. (Istanbul Technical University Technology Transfer Office) in 2022. We thank all the organizations for their collaboration and support. Open access funding provided by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Türkiye (TÜBİTAK).

Funders	Funder number
IDEMA International
Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma Kurumu

Keywords

Fuzzy AHP
Fuzzy TOPSIS
MCDM
Performance measurement
Social impact indicators
Social impact measurement
Women’s empowerment

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1007/s11205-023-03302-7

Cite this

@article{2eed702063b043b5a1067f4fb5a2c0f5,

title = "Revisiting the Impact Evaluation of Women{\textquoteright}s Empowerment: A MCDM-Based Evaluation Indicator Selection Framework Proposal",

abstract = "Women{\textquoteright}s empowerment programs play a critical role in achieving the United Nations{\textquoteright} (UN{\textquoteright}s) sustainable development goal of “Gender Equality”. However, non-profit organizations (NPOs) running women{\textquoteright}s empowerment (WE) programs face challenges in monitoring, assessing, and evaluating the social impact (SI) and program performance due to the lack of solid guidelines. This study aims to analyze the impact and outcome evaluation indicators of WE programs by providing a quantitative tool. A multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) model is proposed to identify and prioritize the performance indicators by utilizing Fuzzy TOPSIS (FTOPSIS) and Fuzzy AHP (FAHP) in a combined methodology. Results validated the identification and classification of the indicators by their importance and viability. In a qualitative study with NPOs working on WE in Turkey, social impact and outcome evaluation indicators are defined and ranked by criteria set in the proposed combined MCDM framework. The study aims to contribute to the theoretical frameworks and practices on social impact and outcome evaluation of women{\textquoteright}s empowerment.",

keywords = "Fuzzy AHP, Fuzzy TOPSIS, MCDM, Performance measurement, Social impact indicators, Social impact measurement, Women{\textquoteright}s empowerment",

author = "Nihan Yıldırım and Fatma K{\"o}roğlu",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} The Author(s) 2024.",

year = "2024",

month = mar,

doi = "10.1007/s11205-023-03302-7",

language = "English",

volume = "172",

pages = "121--145",

journal = "Social Indicators Research",

issn = "0303-8300",

publisher = "Springer Netherlands",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Revisiting the Impact Evaluation of Women’s Empowerment

T2 - A MCDM-Based Evaluation Indicator Selection Framework Proposal

AU - Yıldırım, Nihan

AU - Köroğlu, Fatma

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s) 2024.

PY - 2024/3

Y1 - 2024/3

N2 - Women’s empowerment programs play a critical role in achieving the United Nations’ (UN’s) sustainable development goal of “Gender Equality”. However, non-profit organizations (NPOs) running women’s empowerment (WE) programs face challenges in monitoring, assessing, and evaluating the social impact (SI) and program performance due to the lack of solid guidelines. This study aims to analyze the impact and outcome evaluation indicators of WE programs by providing a quantitative tool. A multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) model is proposed to identify and prioritize the performance indicators by utilizing Fuzzy TOPSIS (FTOPSIS) and Fuzzy AHP (FAHP) in a combined methodology. Results validated the identification and classification of the indicators by their importance and viability. In a qualitative study with NPOs working on WE in Turkey, social impact and outcome evaluation indicators are defined and ranked by criteria set in the proposed combined MCDM framework. The study aims to contribute to the theoretical frameworks and practices on social impact and outcome evaluation of women’s empowerment.

AB - Women’s empowerment programs play a critical role in achieving the United Nations’ (UN’s) sustainable development goal of “Gender Equality”. However, non-profit organizations (NPOs) running women’s empowerment (WE) programs face challenges in monitoring, assessing, and evaluating the social impact (SI) and program performance due to the lack of solid guidelines. This study aims to analyze the impact and outcome evaluation indicators of WE programs by providing a quantitative tool. A multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) model is proposed to identify and prioritize the performance indicators by utilizing Fuzzy TOPSIS (FTOPSIS) and Fuzzy AHP (FAHP) in a combined methodology. Results validated the identification and classification of the indicators by their importance and viability. In a qualitative study with NPOs working on WE in Turkey, social impact and outcome evaluation indicators are defined and ranked by criteria set in the proposed combined MCDM framework. The study aims to contribute to the theoretical frameworks and practices on social impact and outcome evaluation of women’s empowerment.

KW - Fuzzy AHP

KW - Fuzzy TOPSIS

KW - MCDM

KW - Performance measurement

KW - Social impact indicators

KW - Social impact measurement

KW - Women’s empowerment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85184216371&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11205-023-03302-7

DO - 10.1007/s11205-023-03302-7

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85184216371

SN - 0303-8300

VL - 172

SP - 121

EP - 145

JO - Social Indicators Research

JF - Social Indicators Research

IS - 1

ER -

Revisiting the Impact Evaluation of Women’s Empowerment: A MCDM-Based Evaluation Indicator Selection Framework Proposal

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Funding

Keywords

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this