Abstract
Appropriate reviewer assignment significantly impacts the quality of proposal evaluation, as accurate and fair reviews are contingent on their assignment to relevant reviewers. The crucial task of assigning reviewers to submitted proposals is the starting point of the review process and is also known as the reviewer assignment problem (RAP). Due to the obvious restrictions of manual assignment, journal editors, conference organizers, and grant managers demand automatic reviewer assignment approaches. Many studies have proposed assignment solutions in response to the demand for automated procedures since 1992. The primary objective of this survey paper is to provide scholars and practitioners with a comprehensive overview of available research on the RAP. To achieve this goal, this article presents an in-depth systematic review of 103 publications in the field of reviewer assignment published in the past three decades and available in the Web of Science, Scopus, ScienceDirect, Google Scholar, and Semantic Scholar databases. This review paper classified and discussed the RAP approaches into two broad categories and numerous subcategories based on their underlying techniques. Furthermore, potential future research directions for each category are presented. This survey shows that the research on the RAP is becoming more significant and that more effort is required to develop new approaches and a framework.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 761-827 |
| Number of pages | 67 |
| Journal | Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research |
| Volume | 76 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2023 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2023 AI Access Foundation. All rights reserved.
Funding
Because of the intense competition and limited funding sources, selecting appropriate projects to provide financial support is vital for grant organizations (Tian et al., 2002). Project selection is a complex and time-consuming procedure with numerous sub-tasks. One of the important and challenging tasks in this complex process is assigning reviewers to project proposals. Because their opinions impact the potential value of a project, reviewers play an essential role in project selection. The method used to assign the most qualified experts to examine project proposals may have a major impact on the quality of project selection and the grant organizations’ return on investment.