Abstract
This study analyzed, within the scope of disaster law, the suitability of intervention methods used via revisions and changes in plans designed for reserve building areas and areas designated as at-risk. A four-stage methodology was employed: collecting archival documents, digital data, and interview findings; performing a comparative technical analysis of the abrogated and current zoning plans regarding density, social infrastructure, transport network, and functional changes; evaluating changes in terms of plan continuity and integrity; and synthesizing the results to propose recommendations. In the risk area, the current plan reduced the population by 37% and increased social reinforcement areas by 90%, as compared with the previous plan. In the reserve building area, the population increased by 73% and social reinforcement areas grew by 40%, although 90% of these areas did not meet per capita standards.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Journal of Comparative Asian Development |
| Volume | 21 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jan 2025 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2025 IGI Global. All rights reserved.
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 11 Sustainable Cities and Communities
Keywords
- Disaster Law
- Disaster Risk
- Intervention Methods
- Plan Changes
- Sivas
- Urban Planning
- Urban Regeneration
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Plan Interventions Through Revisions/Changes Within the Scope of Disaster Law No. 6306: The Case of Sivas, Türkiye'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver