Phylogeographic analysis of Anatolian bats highlights the importance of the region for preserving the Chiropteran mitochondrial genetic diversity in the Western Palaearctic

Emrah Çoraman*, Andrzej Furman, Ahmet Karataş, Raşit Bilgin

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Identification of intraspecific conservation units and incorporating the distribution of genetic diversity into management plans are crucial requirements for assessing effective protection strategies. This study investigates the phylogeographic structures of 33 bat species present in the Near East in order to evaluate the conservation implications of their intraspecific genetic diversity both at regional and large-scale levels. To compare Anatolian populations with the European ones, we utilized two commonly used mitochondrial markers, Cytb and ND1, and analysed them together with the available sequences from GenBank. The management requirements of the identified clades and their taxonomical relations were evaluated by analysing their distributions and the levels of their genetic differentiations. In 12 species and the large Myotis complex, we identified a total of 15 genetically distinct populations found in the Near East, some of which might represent biologically distinct taxa. Comparing the phylogeographic patterns of different taxa indicates that three regions, the Balkans, the Caucasus, and the southern Anatolia, harbour genetically divergent populations and should have higher priority in conservation practices. Considering that Turkey has one of the richest bat fauna in the Mediterranean region and the Anatolian populations of various species are genetically distinct, protecting populations in Turkey is critically important for preserving the genetic diversity of the bats in the Western Palaearctic. Both regional and large-scale conservation strategies, which incorporate the distribution of genetic diversity, should be assessed and further ecological studies are needed to clarify the taxonomic relations of the identified clades.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1205-1216
Number of pages12
JournalConservation Genetics
Volume14
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2013
Externally publishedYes

Funding

Acknowledgments We thank Yaman Özakın, Yalın Emek C¸ elik, ˙smail Onur Gürses, Pınar Yıldız, Tomasz Postawa, Justyna Bach-anek, Elif İc¸ag˘asıog˘lu, Zirve Yig˘it, Ays¸egül Karatas¸, Ferhat Toprak, Hasan Karakaya, and the members of Bog˘azic¸i University Speleological Society and Bog˘azic¸i International Speleological Society for their support during the field works. We also thank Arpat Özgül for his comments on the manuscript. This research was supported by the Research Fund of Bog˘azic¸i University (Grant No. ‘‘09S101’’ to RB and ‘‘10Y00P2’’ to AF) and the Research Fund of Nig˘de University (Grant No. ‘‘01FEB023’’ to AK).

FundersFunder number
Bog˘azic¸i University09S101, 10Y00P2
Nig˘de University

    Keywords

    • Biogeography
    • Chiroptera
    • Cryptic species
    • Glacial refugia
    • MtDNA lineages
    • Phylogeography

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Phylogeographic analysis of Anatolian bats highlights the importance of the region for preserving the Chiropteran mitochondrial genetic diversity in the Western Palaearctic'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this