Petrochemical features of Miocene volcanism around the Çubukludaǧ graben and Karaburun peninsula, western Turkey: Implications for crustal melting related silicic volcanism

Z. Karacik*, Ş C. Genç, F. Gülmez

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Widespread Neogene volcanism, mainly intermediate and rarely mafic and felsic in composition, was controlled by the extensional tectonic regime in western Turkey. The Karaburun and Cumaovasi volcanics are the cases for understanding the magma source(s) and petrological processes, producing the extension-related mafic and felsic volcanism. The Karaburun volcanics (KV) are mainly oriented north to south in the Karaburun peninsula and span a wide spectrum from basalt (20Ma) to rhyolite (16Ma), and younger trachyte and trachydacites (13Ma). The products of the subaerial silicic volcanism (the Cumaovasi volcanics, CV; 17Ma) which are represented by cluster of rhyolite domes, related pyroclastics occur within the NE-SW trending Çubukludaǧ graben, and intermediate and mafic volcanic rocks are lack in this area. The lavas of the Cumaovasi volcanics are high silica rhyolites and rare dacites which are calc alkaline, peralumious and enriched significantly in LILE. Extremely low Sr, Ba values, extremely Eu depletions and very low LaN/YbN ratios are typical for the rhyolites of CV, similar to the topaz rhyolites. The Karaburun volcanics, with the exception of the minor alkaline basaltic and trachytic lavas, are mainly calc alkaline and metaluminous intermediate lavas. 87Sr/86Sr ratios of the KV and dacitic samples of CV are close to each other and range from 0.708 to 0.709; while Sr isotopic ratios of the rhyolites are significantly high and variable (0.724-0.786). 143Nd/144Nd ratios of the CV and KV, except for the alkaline samples, are similar for both sequences vary from 0.51230 to 0.51242.Geological, geochemical, isotopic and radiochronologic data reveal that the KV and CV were formed in extensional tectonic setting, but evolved by different petrological processes in different magma chambers. During the Neogene, underplated mafic magma was injected into the crust and hybridized by mantle and crustal derived materials. Geochemical features and trace element modeling for the mafic members of the KV indicate that they were derived from enriched lithospheric mantle and modified by fractional crystallization from basalt to rhyolite (. Helvaci et al., 2009). Unexpectedly, the felsic lavas from Cumaovasi region have a unique chemical composition, and similar to the extension related rhyolites formed from small magma bodies. Our data reveal that extension related mafic inputs caused crustal anatectic melting and formed felsic melts that rapidly ascended into the upper crust. The Cumaovasi felsic rocks were differentiated into the highly evolved silica-rich melts within the magma chambers trapped near the surface.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)199-217
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of Asian Earth Sciences
Volume73
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 5 Sept 2013

Funding

This study was supported by TÜBİTAK (the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey) – ÇAYDAG Project Numbers: 107Y014 and 110Y161. We are deeply indebted to Dr. Judith Bunbury who corrected earlier version of the manuscript and made valuable improvements. We are also grateful for insightful comments provided by anonymous reviewers that significantly improved the manuscript, Dr. Bor-ming Jahn and Dr. Irene Yao for editorial help.

FundersFunder number
TÜBİTAK
Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştirma Kurumu107Y014, 110Y161

    Keywords

    • Crustal melting
    • Extension
    • Extremely Eu anomaly
    • Felsic volcanism
    • Topaz
    • Western Turkey

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Petrochemical features of Miocene volcanism around the Çubukludaǧ graben and Karaburun peninsula, western Turkey: Implications for crustal melting related silicic volcanism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this