Perspectives on knowledge management capabilities in universities: A qualitative identification of organisational factors

F. Sehkar Fayda-Kinik*, Munevver Cetin

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Prior research has had a limited approach to identifying organisational factors related to knowledge management (KM) practices of higher education institutions (HEIs), the centre for knowledge creation. This qualitative study explored such factors affecting KM capabilities from the perspectives of 30 full-time academics in public universities, and identified the dimensions of the KM capabilities framework. Results revealed that physical conditions, budget, human and technological resource management, division of labour, workload, time management, communication, bureaucracy, structural differentiation, motivation, individualism, and organisational behaviour affect KM infrastructure capabilities; bureaucracy, KM teams, institutional platforms, organisational structure, knowledge maps, vision, individual attitudes, academic collaboration, process management, budget, decision-making processes, sustainable academic KM, transparency, labour force, knowledge security, organisational culture, accessibility, and archiving affect KM process capabilities. These results contribute to identifying the organisational factors influencing KM that are critical to guiding practitioners and administrators of HEIs in developing more effective KM strategies and practices.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)375-394
Number of pages20
JournalHigher Education Quarterly
Volume77
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Keywords

  • higher education
  • knowledge management
  • knowledge management capabilities
  • organisational factors
  • qualitative research

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Perspectives on knowledge management capabilities in universities: A qualitative identification of organisational factors'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this