Parametric variations in aspect ratio, leading edge and planform shapes for the rectilinear pitch cases of AVT-202 (invited)

Onur Son; Oksan Cetiner; P. R.R.J. Stevens; Holger Babinsky; Field Manar; Peter Mancini; Anya R. Jones; Michael V. Ol; Arif C. Gozukara

doi:10.2514/6.2016-0289

Parametric variations in aspect ratio, leading edge and planform shapes for the rectilinear pitch cases of AVT-202 (invited)

Onur Son, Oksan Cetiner, P. R.R.J. Stevens, Holger Babinsky, Field Manar, Peter Mancini, Anya R. Jones, Michael V. Ol, Arif C. Gozukara

Department of Astronautical Engineering

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution › peer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The Applied Vehicle Technology Panel Task Group AVT-202 “Extension of Fundamental Flow Physics to Practical MAV Aerodynamics” has introduced four canonical cases. Rectilinear pitch is probably the most studied one, especially considering its parametric variations. The canonical case of rectilinear pitch considers a rectangular flat plate wing of aspect ratio 4, with a thickness of less than 5% and round edges, undergoing a pitch up motion in a freestream. In the beginning, the wing is at condition CL = 0 and then pitches up to 45° of effective incidence either in 1 or 6 chord lengths of travel relative to fluid (known as fast and slow cases), pivoting around its leading edge. This paper focuses on parametric variations of the aforementioned canonical case, namely variations in aspect ratio, leading edge and planform shapes.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	54th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting
Publisher	American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc, AIAA
ISBN (Print)	9781624103933
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2016-0289
Publication status	Published - 2016
Event	54th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, 2016 - San Diego, United States Duration: 4 Jan 2016 → 8 Jan 2016

Publication series

Name	54th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting
Volume	0

Conference

Conference	54th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, 2016
Country/Territory	United States
City	San Diego
Period	4/01/16 → 8/01/16

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2016, (publisher Name). All Rights Reserved.

Funding

The authors from ITU acknowledge the funding provided by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) Grant 112M682.

Funders	Funder number
TUBITAK	112M682
International Technological University
Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştirma Kurumu

Access to Document

10.2514/6.2016-0289

Cite this

Son, O., Cetiner, O., Stevens, P. R. R. J., Babinsky, H., Manar, F., Mancini, P., Jones, A. R., Ol, M. V., & Gozukara, A. C. (2016). Parametric variations in aspect ratio, leading edge and planform shapes for the rectilinear pitch cases of AVT-202 (invited). In 54th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting (54th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting; Vol. 0). American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc, AIAA. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2016-0289

@inproceedings{c3658e9ead9f473d8f58edc98eaeae1d,

title = "Parametric variations in aspect ratio, leading edge and planform shapes for the rectilinear pitch cases of AVT-202 (invited)",

abstract = "The Applied Vehicle Technology Panel Task Group AVT-202 “Extension of Fundamental Flow Physics to Practical MAV Aerodynamics” has introduced four canonical cases. Rectilinear pitch is probably the most studied one, especially considering its parametric variations. The canonical case of rectilinear pitch considers a rectangular flat plate wing of aspect ratio 4, with a thickness of less than 5% and round edges, undergoing a pitch up motion in a freestream. In the beginning, the wing is at condition CL = 0 and then pitches up to 45° of effective incidence either in 1 or 6 chord lengths of travel relative to fluid (known as fast and slow cases), pivoting around its leading edge. This paper focuses on parametric variations of the aforementioned canonical case, namely variations in aspect ratio, leading edge and planform shapes.",

author = "Onur Son and Oksan Cetiner and Stevens, {P. R.R.J.} and Holger Babinsky and Field Manar and Peter Mancini and Jones, {Anya R.} and Ol, {Michael V.} and Gozukara, {Arif C.}",

year = "2016",

doi = "10.2514/6.2016-0289",

language = "English",

isbn = "9781624103933",

series = "54th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting",

publisher = "American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc, AIAA",

booktitle = "54th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting",

}

Son, O, Cetiner, O, Stevens, PRRJ, Babinsky, H, Manar, F, Mancini, P, Jones, AR, Ol, MV & Gozukara, AC 2016, Parametric variations in aspect ratio, leading edge and planform shapes for the rectilinear pitch cases of AVT-202 (invited). in 54th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting. 54th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, vol. 0, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc, AIAA, 54th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, 2016, San Diego, United States, 4/01/16. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2016-0289

Parametric variations in aspect ratio, leading edge and planform shapes for the rectilinear pitch cases of AVT-202 (invited). / Son, Onur; Cetiner, Oksan; Stevens, P. R.R.J. et al.
54th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc, AIAA, 2016. (54th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting; Vol. 0).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution › peer-review

TY - GEN

T1 - Parametric variations in aspect ratio, leading edge and planform shapes for the rectilinear pitch cases of AVT-202 (invited)

AU - Son, Onur

AU - Cetiner, Oksan

AU - Stevens, P. R.R.J.

AU - Babinsky, Holger

AU - Manar, Field

AU - Mancini, Peter

AU - Jones, Anya R.

AU - Ol, Michael V.

AU - Gozukara, Arif C.

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - The Applied Vehicle Technology Panel Task Group AVT-202 “Extension of Fundamental Flow Physics to Practical MAV Aerodynamics” has introduced four canonical cases. Rectilinear pitch is probably the most studied one, especially considering its parametric variations. The canonical case of rectilinear pitch considers a rectangular flat plate wing of aspect ratio 4, with a thickness of less than 5% and round edges, undergoing a pitch up motion in a freestream. In the beginning, the wing is at condition CL = 0 and then pitches up to 45° of effective incidence either in 1 or 6 chord lengths of travel relative to fluid (known as fast and slow cases), pivoting around its leading edge. This paper focuses on parametric variations of the aforementioned canonical case, namely variations in aspect ratio, leading edge and planform shapes.

AB - The Applied Vehicle Technology Panel Task Group AVT-202 “Extension of Fundamental Flow Physics to Practical MAV Aerodynamics” has introduced four canonical cases. Rectilinear pitch is probably the most studied one, especially considering its parametric variations. The canonical case of rectilinear pitch considers a rectangular flat plate wing of aspect ratio 4, with a thickness of less than 5% and round edges, undergoing a pitch up motion in a freestream. In the beginning, the wing is at condition CL = 0 and then pitches up to 45° of effective incidence either in 1 or 6 chord lengths of travel relative to fluid (known as fast and slow cases), pivoting around its leading edge. This paper focuses on parametric variations of the aforementioned canonical case, namely variations in aspect ratio, leading edge and planform shapes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85007480817&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2514/6.2016-0289

DO - 10.2514/6.2016-0289

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:85007480817

SN - 9781624103933

T3 - 54th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting

BT - 54th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting

PB - American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc, AIAA

T2 - 54th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, 2016

Y2 - 4 January 2016 through 8 January 2016

ER -

Parametric variations in aspect ratio, leading edge and planform shapes for the rectilinear pitch cases of AVT-202 (invited)

Abstract

Publication series

Conference

Bibliographical note

Funding

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this