Abstract
This study investigates the income–environment relationship in Turkey by examining the components of the ecological footprint indicator within the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) framework. Using co-integration techniques for the 1961–2008 period, we find an inverted U-shaped, hence EKC-type, relationship only between production footprint and income. Consumption, import and export footprints are found to be monotonically increasing with income, which suggests that Turkey tends to export the negative consequences of its consumption by importing rather than producing domestically the environmentally harmful products. We also find that imported footprint is not enough to cover the biocapacity deficit in Turkey, which results in a continuous decline in domestic biocapacity.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 101-115 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| Journal | Middle East Development Journal |
| Volume | 9 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2 Jan 2017 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2017, © 2017 Economic Research Forum.
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
-
SDG 12 Responsible Consumption and Production
Keywords
- biocapacity deficit
- co-integration
- ecological footprint
- economic growth
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Nature and economic growth in Turkey: what does ecological footprint imply?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver