Nature and economic growth in Turkey: what does ecological footprint imply?

Sevil Acar*, Ahmet Atıl Aşıcı

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

36 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study investigates the income–environment relationship in Turkey by examining the components of the ecological footprint indicator within the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) framework. Using co-integration techniques for the 1961–2008 period, we find an inverted U-shaped, hence EKC-type, relationship only between production footprint and income. Consumption, import and export footprints are found to be monotonically increasing with income, which suggests that Turkey tends to export the negative consequences of its consumption by importing rather than producing domestically the environmentally harmful products. We also find that imported footprint is not enough to cover the biocapacity deficit in Turkey, which results in a continuous decline in domestic biocapacity.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)101-115
Number of pages15
JournalMiddle East Development Journal
Volume9
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Jan 2017

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2017, © 2017 Economic Research Forum.

Keywords

  • biocapacity deficit
  • co-integration
  • ecological footprint
  • economic growth

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Nature and economic growth in Turkey: what does ecological footprint imply?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this