Abstract
This study evaluates genetic algorithm (GA), adaptive genetic algorithm (AGA), and differential evolution (DE) for optimising underground mining ramps. Using a 177-segment baseline, the algorithms were compared for cost efficiency. DE demonstrated superior performance, achieving an 11.4% cost reduction (580.9s runtime), significantly outperforming AGA (7.15%) and GA (5.5%). The analysis highlights the critical value of location optimisation, where refining ramp paths minimises fault encounters and support requirements. These findings validate that integrating geometric refinements with site-specific geotechnical constraints substantially enhances the financial viability and safety of underground operations.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | International Journal of Mining, Reclamation and Environment |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Accepted/In press - 2026 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2026 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
Keywords
- Evolutionary optimisation
- cost minimisation
- underground mining
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Metaheuristic optimisation of underground mining ramp designs for cost-efficient excavation and support'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver