Abstract
Do mandatory spending programs such as Medicare improve efficiency? We analyze a model with two parties allocating a fixed budget to a public good and private transfers each period over an infinite horizon. We compare two institutions that differ in whether public good spending is discretionary or mandatory. We model mandatory spending as an endogenous status quo since it is enacted by law and remains in effect until changed. Mandatory programs result in higher public good spending; furthermore, they ex ante Pareto dominate discretionary programs when parties are patient, persistence of power is low, and polarization is low.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 2941-2974 |
| Number of pages | 34 |
| Journal | American Economic Review |
| Volume | 104 |
| Issue number | 10 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Oct 2014 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2014, American Economic Association. All rights reserved.
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Mandatory versus discretionary spending: The status quo effect'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver