Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Mandatory versus discretionary spending: The status quo effect

  • T. Renee Bowen*
  • , Ying Chen
  • , Hülya Eraslan
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Stanford University
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • Rice University

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

62 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Do mandatory spending programs such as Medicare improve efficiency? We analyze a model with two parties allocating a fixed budget to a public good and private transfers each period over an infinite horizon. We compare two institutions that differ in whether public good spending is discretionary or mandatory. We model mandatory spending as an endogenous status quo since it is enacted by law and remains in effect until changed. Mandatory programs result in higher public good spending; furthermore, they ex ante Pareto dominate discretionary programs when parties are patient, persistence of power is low, and polarization is low.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2941-2974
Number of pages34
JournalAmerican Economic Review
Volume104
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2014
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2014, American Economic Association. All rights reserved.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Mandatory versus discretionary spending: The status quo effect'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this