TY - JOUR
T1 - Long term experiences in a pilot-scale high-rate activated sludge system with lamella clarifier
T2 - Effluent quality and carbon capture
AU - Gulhan, Hazal
AU - Hamidi, Muhammed Nimet
AU - Abdelrahman, Amr Mustafa
AU - Fakioglu, Malhun
AU - Mese, Beyda
AU - Yoruk, Mustafa
AU - Kurt, Ece Sagir
AU - Koyuncu, Ismail
AU - Guven, Huseyin
AU - Ozgun, Hale
AU - Ersahin, Mustafa Evren
AU - Ozturk, Izzet
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2022/10
Y1 - 2022/10
N2 - The limited available area for treatment plants in population-dense settlements increases the need for technologies with smaller footprints. The high-rate activated sludge (HRAS) process aims to capture carbon from wastewater by limiting biological assimilation with a high loading rate which enables occupying a smaller footprint. The footprint of the HRAS system can be further reduced by using lamella clarifiers instead of conventional ones. Conventional clarifiers were used in previous studies on the operational parameters of the HRAS system. This study aims to determine the optimum operational conditions in terms of hydraulic retention time (HRT) (75 and 50 min) and dissolved oxygen (DO) concentration (0.2, 0.5, and 0.8 mg/L) of a HRAS system including a lamella clarifier using 124 days data. The best effluent quality and carbon capture were observed at HRT of 75 min and DO concentration of 0.5 mg/L, which was considered the optimum condition with the highest extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) production in the reactor. The high EPS production helped flocs come together and settle faster with the highest carbon capture compared to other operational conditions. Based on the mass balance, 41.7 % of chemical oxygen demand (COD), 34 % of total nitrogen (TN), and 60 % of total phosphorus (TP) in the influent were captured into the sludge stream at the optimum condition. Lower HRT and DO concentration decreased EPS production and led to particulate COD loss through effluent and hampered carbon capture. Furthermore, higher DO concentration caused more carbon loss through oxidation.
AB - The limited available area for treatment plants in population-dense settlements increases the need for technologies with smaller footprints. The high-rate activated sludge (HRAS) process aims to capture carbon from wastewater by limiting biological assimilation with a high loading rate which enables occupying a smaller footprint. The footprint of the HRAS system can be further reduced by using lamella clarifiers instead of conventional ones. Conventional clarifiers were used in previous studies on the operational parameters of the HRAS system. This study aims to determine the optimum operational conditions in terms of hydraulic retention time (HRT) (75 and 50 min) and dissolved oxygen (DO) concentration (0.2, 0.5, and 0.8 mg/L) of a HRAS system including a lamella clarifier using 124 days data. The best effluent quality and carbon capture were observed at HRT of 75 min and DO concentration of 0.5 mg/L, which was considered the optimum condition with the highest extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) production in the reactor. The high EPS production helped flocs come together and settle faster with the highest carbon capture compared to other operational conditions. Based on the mass balance, 41.7 % of chemical oxygen demand (COD), 34 % of total nitrogen (TN), and 60 % of total phosphorus (TP) in the influent were captured into the sludge stream at the optimum condition. Lower HRT and DO concentration decreased EPS production and led to particulate COD loss through effluent and hampered carbon capture. Furthermore, higher DO concentration caused more carbon loss through oxidation.
KW - Carbon capture
KW - Dissolved oxygen
KW - Extracellular polymeric substances
KW - High-rate activated sludge
KW - Hydraulic retention time
KW - Lamella clarifier
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85138791148&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jwpe.2022.103138
DO - 10.1016/j.jwpe.2022.103138
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85138791148
SN - 2214-7144
VL - 49
JO - Journal of Water Process Engineering
JF - Journal of Water Process Engineering
M1 - 103138
ER -