Life cycle assessment of safflower and sugar beet molasses-based biofuels

Asli Isler-Kaya*, Filiz Karaosmanoglu

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the environmental effects of using safflower oil and molasses-based bioethanol by calculating the environmental impacts of safflower oil methyl ester (SOME), safflower oil ethyl ester (SOEE), and molasses-based bioethanol. The results were compared to fossil-based fuels (diesel and gasoline) within the life cycle assessment framework. Characterization results obtained with Eco-indicator 99 method indicate all three biofuels are more advantageous than fossil fuels in all categories (carcinogens, climate change, respiratory effects, acidification/eutrophication, ecotoxicity, fossil fuel use) except mineral and land use. Based on the normalization results, fossil fuel and land use are the most important environmental impact categories. Using the IPCC method, the carbon intensity was calculated at 16.72, 15.24, 22.23, 99.45, and 108.48 g CO2 per MJ for SOME, SOEE, bioethanol, diesel, and gasoline, respectively. The weighted impacts were calculated at 0.675, 0.876, 0.98, 1.65, and 2.1 for bioethanol, SOEE, SOME, diesel, and gasoline, respectively. The main environmental impact of fossil fuels comes from using fossil resources, while the essential part of the environmental effects of biofuels comes from the agricultural stage, indicating the importance of choosing pesticides, fertilizers, irrigation, and used fuels. This effect was even more critical for safflower-based biofuels; however, the impact of processing steps is lower than for bioethanol. Although the environmental effects of these biofuels vary in different categories, they are sustainable and cleaner alternatives to fossil-based fuels.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1127-1138
Number of pages12
JournalRenewable Energy
Volume201
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2022

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Elsevier Ltd

Funding

The authors would like to thank DB Agricultural Energy Industry and Trade Inc. and Konya Şeker Industry and Trade Inc.

FundersFunder number
DB Agricultural Energy Industry and Trade Inc.

    Keywords

    • Ethyl ester
    • Life cycle assessment
    • Methyl ester
    • Molasses
    • Safflower
    • Sugar beet

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Life cycle assessment of safflower and sugar beet molasses-based biofuels'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this