Life cycle assessment of biological nutrient removal considering seasonal variations in environmental impacts

Filiz Daskiran*, Huseyin Guven, Hale Ozgun, Mustafa Evren Ersahin

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Wastewater treatment plays a critical role in mitigating environmental impacts. However, the environmental performance of treatment processes varies depending on operational configurations and external factors such as seasonal changes. This study aimed to investigate three wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) with different biological nutrient removal (BNR) configurations -anaerobic-anoxic-oxic (A2O), five-stage Bardenpho, and Johannesburg processes- using the life cycle assessment (LCA) approach to comparatively examine their environmental performances and to conduct an LCA study using two functional units (FUs) (1 m3 of wastewater treated and 1 kg of total nitrogen (TN) removed), revealing seasonal environmental impacts for A2O process to reveal the difference in interpretation according to the FU selected. The ReCiPe 2016 methodology was employed, focusing on ten key impact categories, including global warming, marine eutrophication, freshwater eutrophication, human carcinogenic toxicity, human non-carcinogenic toxicity, marine ecotoxicity, freshwater ecotoxicity, terrestrial ecotoxicity, terrestrial acidification, and fossil resource scarcity. The results show that the Johannesburg process achieves better environmental performance compared to the others. The superior performance of the Johannesburg process can be attributed to having no fugitive methane (CH4) emissions due to the absence of anaerobic digester in the sludge treatment and its competitive TN removal rates, which align directly with sustainability objectives like emission reduction and reducing carbon footprint. Choosing the right FU is crucial for sustainability. The FU based on 1 kg TN removed provided a more representative view of environmental efficiency under changing seasonal conditions. These findings emphasize the importance of aligning FU selection with sustainability goals. In terms of wastewater management policy, the study suggests that monitoring based on the percentage of pollutant load removed or total annual emissions generated would be more meaningful, taking into account changing external conditions such as seasonal factors.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)177-189
Number of pages13
JournalSustainable Production and Consumption
Volume53
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Institution of Chemical Engineers

Keywords

  • Biological nutrient removal
  • Functional unit
  • Life cycle assessment
  • Seasonal evaluation
  • Sustainability
  • Wastewater treatment

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Life cycle assessment of biological nutrient removal considering seasonal variations in environmental impacts'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this