Investigating the Dynamic Creep of Polymer Modified Hot Mix Asphalt

Ghassan Suleiman*, Haider Habeeb Aodah, Shadi Hanandeh, Murat Ergun, Reem Abu Salim, Deya Qtiashat

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Jordan's road network continues to deteriorate as a consequence of the continuous increase in traffic and the absence of adequate maintenance work. The primary objective of this study was to enhance HMA performance by using polymer-modified asphalt mixtures. The polymer modifier known commercially as Eastman (EE-2) was mixed with binder penetration grade (60-70) at a ratio of 12%. In order to investigate the performance of polymer, the dynamic creep, the resilient modulus and the stability-flow tests were performed. Marshall Mix design was utilized to prepare a total of 50 samples, of which 20 were used to determine the optimal binder content, and the remaining samples were used to determine the effect of EE-2 modifier on asphalt mixtures. The results showed that the optimal asphalt content was 4.57 percent and revealed that the addition of EE-2 polymer to asphalt cement contributed to the production of a variety of desirable properties. The most important indicator of these developments is increased rutting resistance. For instance, the total permanent deformation has decreased by 87% (8500 to 1000 μm). Conversely, addition of EE-2 has resulted in a threefold increase in the resilience modulus (from 3632 to 10590 MPa).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)387-396
Number of pages10
JournalCivil and Environmental Engineering
Volume20
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Ghassan Suleiman et al., published by Sciendo.

Keywords

  • Asphalt Mixture
  • Dynamic Creep
  • Polymer
  • Resilient Modulus
  • Rutting

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Investigating the Dynamic Creep of Polymer Modified Hot Mix Asphalt'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this