Integration of fuzzy AHP with other fuzzy multicriteria methods: A state of the art survey

Cengiz Kahraman*, Sezi Çevi K. Onar, Başar Öztayşi, ŞüKran ŞeKer, Ali Karaşan

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

AHP is the most widely used multi-criteria decision making method (MCDM) for selection among alternatives in the literature. AHP can be used as a standalone decision making method or it can be used by integrating with another method in selection problems. Vagueness and impreciseness in the data, especially when linguistic data used, can be captured by fuzzy sets. Extensions of fuzzy sets such as hesitant fuzzy sets, intuitionistic fuzzy sets, and spherical fuzzy sets have been often employed in decision making modeling. In this paper, we present a state of the art survey of fuzzy extensions of AHP when it is integrated with another fuzzy MCDM method such as fuzzy VIKOR, fuzzy TOPSIS, fuzzy ELECTRE, fuzzy PROMETHEE, fuzzy, EDAS, fuzzy CODAS, fuzzy COPRAS, fuzzy TODIM, fuzzy MULTIMOORA, fuzzy MABAC, and fuzzy WASPAS. Graphical and tabular illustrations are given to summarize the results of the literature survey.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)61-92
Number of pages32
JournalJournal of Multiple-Valued Logic and Soft Computing
Volume35
Issue number1-2
Publication statusPublished - 2020

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
©2020 Old City Publishing, Inc.

Keywords

  • EDAS
  • Fuzzy
  • Fuzzy AHP
  • Fuzzy CODAS
  • Fuzzy COPRAS
  • Fuzzy ELECTRE
  • Fuzzy MABAC
  • Fuzzy MULTIMOORA
  • Fuzzy PROMETHEE
  • Fuzzy TODIM
  • Fuzzy TOPSIS
  • Fuzzy VIKOR
  • Fuzzy WASPAS

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Integration of fuzzy AHP with other fuzzy multicriteria methods: A state of the art survey'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this