Abstract
Computer programming in architecture seems to be commonplace throughout the eCAADe Community. Yet, a critical evaluation of a programming course as seen from a student’s side is still missing. During a week-long programming workshop in a fellow university, we have been assessing subjective parameters such as mood, quality of presentation and comprehensibility, comparing these to the actual topics that were covered at this instance. Our results contribute to understanding architecture students in their quest towards algorithmical thinking. We are convinced that the discussion given in this paper will help other teachers to further increase the quality of their lectures. Furthermore, the structure of our approach may serve as basis for further research into recording student behavior during programming courses.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Respecting Fragile Places |
Editors | Tadeja Zupancic, Matevz Juvancic, Spela Verovsek, Jutraz Jutraz |
Publisher | Education and research in Computer Aided Architectural Design in Europe |
Pages | 51-56 |
Number of pages | 6 |
ISBN (Print) | 9789491207013 |
Publication status | Published - 2011 |
Event | 29th Conference on Education in Computer Aided Architectural Design in Europe, eCAADe 2011 - Ljubljana, Slovenia Duration: 21 Sept 2011 → 24 Sept 2011 |
Publication series
Name | Proceedings of the International Conference on Education and Research in Computer Aided Architectural Design in Europe |
---|---|
ISSN (Print) | 2684-1843 |
Conference
Conference | 29th Conference on Education in Computer Aided Architectural Design in Europe, eCAADe 2011 |
---|---|
Country/Territory | Slovenia |
City | Ljubljana |
Period | 21/09/11 → 24/09/11 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2011, Education and research in Computer Aided Architectural Design in Europe. All rights reserved.
Keywords
- Assessment
- Programming
- Teaching