How Investigators Can Assess Concrete Strength with On-site Non-destructive Tests and Lessons to Draw from a Benchmark

Denys Breysse; Jean Paul Balayssac; Samuele Biondi; Adorjan Borosnyoi; Elena Candigliota; Leonardo Chiauzzi; Vincent Garnier; Michael Grantham; Oguz Gunes; Vincenza Anna Maria Luprano; Angelo Masi; Valerio Pfister; Zoubir Mehdi Sbartaï; Katalin Szilagyi

doi:10.1007/978-3-030-64900-5_6

How Investigators Can Assess Concrete Strength with On-site Non-destructive Tests and Lessons to Draw from a Benchmark

Denys Breysse
, Jean Paul Balayssac^*
, Samuele Biondi
, Adorjan Borosnyoi
, Elena Candigliota
, Leonardo Chiauzzi
, Vincent Garnier
, Michael Grantham
, Oguz Gunes
, Vincenza Anna Maria Luprano
, Angelo Masi
, Valerio Pfister
, Zoubir Mehdi Sbartaï
, Katalin Szilagyi

^*Corresponding author for this work

Department of Civil Engineering

Université de Bordeaux
INSA-UPS Génie Civil
Gabriele d'Annunzio University
Budapest University of Technology and Economics
Agenzia nazionale per le nuove tecnologie, l'energia e lo sviluppo economico sostenibile
University of Basilicata
CNRS
Consultant - Sandberg LLP

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter › peer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A benchmark is carried out in order to compare how 13 experts define and can carry out an NDT investigation program and derive strength values from NDT measurements. The benchmark is based on simulations, which reproduces a synthetic data set corresponding to a grid of twenty 3m-high columns defining the structure of a building made up of beams and columns. The experts must assess the mean and the standard deviation of compressive strength. Three levels of assessment are considered corresponding to different quantities of test results (destructive or non destructive) available for the experts. The comparison of the various strategies used by the experts and the analysis of results enables the identification of the most influential parameters that define an investigation approach and influence its efficiency and accuracy. A special emphasis is placed on the magnitude of the measurement error. A model of the investigation strategy is also proposed.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	RILEM State-of-the-Art Reports
Publisher	Springer Science and Business Media B.V.
Pages	183-218
Number of pages	36
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64900-5_6
Publication status	Published - 2021

Publication series

Name	RILEM State-of-the-Art Reports
Volume	32
ISSN (Print)	2213-204X
ISSN (Electronic)	2213-2031

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, RILEM.

Access to Document

10.1007/978-3-030-64900-5_6

Cite this

Breysse, D., Balayssac, J. P., Biondi, S., Borosnyoi, A., Candigliota, E., Chiauzzi, L., Garnier, V., Grantham, M., Gunes, O., Luprano, V. A. M., Masi, A., Pfister, V., Sbartaï, Z. M., & Szilagyi, K. (2021). How Investigators Can Assess Concrete Strength with On-site Non-destructive Tests and Lessons to Draw from a Benchmark. In RILEM State-of-the-Art Reports (pp. 183-218). (RILEM State-of-the-Art Reports; Vol. 32). Springer Science and Business Media B.V.. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64900-5_6

@inbook{551c8e20ee4248fb942c8e31949b8ffe,

title = "How Investigators Can Assess Concrete Strength with On-site Non-destructive Tests and Lessons to Draw from a Benchmark",

abstract = "A benchmark is carried out in order to compare how 13 experts define and can carry out an NDT investigation program and derive strength values from NDT measurements. The benchmark is based on simulations, which reproduces a synthetic data set corresponding to a grid of twenty 3m-high columns defining the structure of a building made up of beams and columns. The experts must assess the mean and the standard deviation of compressive strength. Three levels of assessment are considered corresponding to different quantities of test results (destructive or non destructive) available for the experts. The comparison of the various strategies used by the experts and the analysis of results enables the identification of the most influential parameters that define an investigation approach and influence its efficiency and accuracy. A special emphasis is placed on the magnitude of the measurement error. A model of the investigation strategy is also proposed.",

author = "Denys Breysse and Balayssac, \{Jean Paul\} and Samuele Biondi and Adorjan Borosnyoi and Elena Candigliota and Leonardo Chiauzzi and Vincent Garnier and Michael Grantham and Oguz Gunes and Luprano, \{Vincenza Anna Maria\} and Angelo Masi and Valerio Pfister and Sbarta{\"i}, \{Zoubir Mehdi\} and Katalin Szilagyi",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021, RILEM.",

year = "2021",

doi = "10.1007/978-3-030-64900-5\_6",

language = "English",

series = "RILEM State-of-the-Art Reports",

publisher = "Springer Science and Business Media B.V.",

pages = "183--218",

booktitle = "RILEM State-of-the-Art Reports",

address = "Germany",

}

Breysse, D, Balayssac, JP, Biondi, S, Borosnyoi, A, Candigliota, E, Chiauzzi, L, Garnier, V, Grantham, M, Gunes, O, Luprano, VAM, Masi, A, Pfister, V, Sbartaï, ZM & Szilagyi, K 2021, How Investigators Can Assess Concrete Strength with On-site Non-destructive Tests and Lessons to Draw from a Benchmark. in RILEM State-of-the-Art Reports. RILEM State-of-the-Art Reports, vol. 32, Springer Science and Business Media B.V., pp. 183-218. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64900-5_6

How Investigators Can Assess Concrete Strength with On-site Non-destructive Tests and Lessons to Draw from a Benchmark. / Breysse, Denys; Balayssac, Jean Paul; Biondi, Samuele et al.
RILEM State-of-the-Art Reports. Springer Science and Business Media B.V., 2021. p. 183-218 (RILEM State-of-the-Art Reports; Vol. 32).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter › peer-review

TY - CHAP

T1 - How Investigators Can Assess Concrete Strength with On-site Non-destructive Tests and Lessons to Draw from a Benchmark

AU - Breysse, Denys

AU - Balayssac, Jean Paul

AU - Biondi, Samuele

AU - Borosnyoi, Adorjan

AU - Candigliota, Elena

AU - Chiauzzi, Leonardo

AU - Garnier, Vincent

AU - Grantham, Michael

AU - Gunes, Oguz

AU - Luprano, Vincenza Anna Maria

AU - Masi, Angelo

AU - Pfister, Valerio

AU - Sbartaï, Zoubir Mehdi

AU - Szilagyi, Katalin

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - A benchmark is carried out in order to compare how 13 experts define and can carry out an NDT investigation program and derive strength values from NDT measurements. The benchmark is based on simulations, which reproduces a synthetic data set corresponding to a grid of twenty 3m-high columns defining the structure of a building made up of beams and columns. The experts must assess the mean and the standard deviation of compressive strength. Three levels of assessment are considered corresponding to different quantities of test results (destructive or non destructive) available for the experts. The comparison of the various strategies used by the experts and the analysis of results enables the identification of the most influential parameters that define an investigation approach and influence its efficiency and accuracy. A special emphasis is placed on the magnitude of the measurement error. A model of the investigation strategy is also proposed.

AB - A benchmark is carried out in order to compare how 13 experts define and can carry out an NDT investigation program and derive strength values from NDT measurements. The benchmark is based on simulations, which reproduces a synthetic data set corresponding to a grid of twenty 3m-high columns defining the structure of a building made up of beams and columns. The experts must assess the mean and the standard deviation of compressive strength. Three levels of assessment are considered corresponding to different quantities of test results (destructive or non destructive) available for the experts. The comparison of the various strategies used by the experts and the analysis of results enables the identification of the most influential parameters that define an investigation approach and influence its efficiency and accuracy. A special emphasis is placed on the magnitude of the measurement error. A model of the investigation strategy is also proposed.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85105231444

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-030-64900-5_6

DO - 10.1007/978-3-030-64900-5_6

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:85105231444

T3 - RILEM State-of-the-Art Reports

SP - 183

EP - 218

BT - RILEM State-of-the-Art Reports

PB - Springer Science and Business Media B.V.

ER -

How Investigators Can Assess Concrete Strength with On-site Non-destructive Tests and Lessons to Draw from a Benchmark

Abstract

Publication series

Bibliographical note

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this