Health benefits and risks of fermented foods—the PIMENTO initiative

Smilja Todorovic, Asli Akpinar, Ricardo Assunção, Cornelia Bär, Simona L. Bavaro, Muzeyyen Berkel Kasikci, Julieta Domínguez-Soberanes, Vittorio Capozzi, Paul D. Cotter, Eun Hee Doo, Burcu Gündüz Ergün, Mustafa Guzel, Hayriye S. Harsa, Emre Hastaoglu, Christèle Humblot, Bahtir Hyseni, Muge I. Hosoglu, Aline Issa, Barçın Karakaş-Budak, Sibel KarakayaHarun Kesenkas, Erhan Keyvan, Ibrahim E. Künili, Mary Liis Kütt, Marta Laranjo, Sandrine Louis, Fani T. Mantzouridou, Antonia Matalas, Baltasar Mayo, Sandra Mojsova, Arghya Mukherjee, Anastasios Nikolaou, Fatih Ortakci, Diana Paveljšek, Giancarlo Perrone, Eugenia Pertziger, Dushica Santa, Taner Sar, Isabelle Savary-Auzeloux, Clarissa Schwab, Małgorzata Starowicz, Marko Stojanović, Michail Syrpas, Jyoti P. Tamang, Oktay Yerlikaya, Birsen Yilmaz, Jeadran Malagon-Rojas, Seppo Salminen, Juana Frias, Christophe Chassard, Guy Vergères*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Worldwide, fermented foods (FF) are recognized as healthy and safe. Despite the rapid increase of research papers, there is a lack of systematic evaluation of the health benefits and risks of FF. The COST Action CA20128 “Promoting innovation of fermented foods” (PIMENTO) aims to provide a comprehensive assessment on the available evidence by compiling a set of 16 reviews. Seven reviews will cover clinical and biological endpoints associated with major health indicators across several organ systems, including the cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, neurological, immune, and skeletal systems. Nine reviews will address broader biological questions associated with FF including bioactive compounds and vitamin production, nutrient bioavailability and bioaccessibility, the role of FF in healthy diets and personalized nutrition, food safety, regulatory practices, and finally, the health properties of novel and ethnic FF. For each outcome assessed in the reviews, an innovative approach will be adopted based on EFSA’s published guidance for health claim submissions. In particular, each review will be composed of three parts: (1) a systematic review of available human studies; (2) a non-systematic review of the mechanism of action related to the clinical endpoints measured by the human studies identified in part 1; and (3) a non-systematic review of the characterization of the FF investigated in the human studies identified in part 1. The evidence and research gaps derived from the reviews will be summarized and published in the form of a strategic road map that will pave the way for future research on FF.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1458536
JournalFrontiers in Nutrition
Volume11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2024 Todorovic, Akpinar, Assunção, Bär, Bavaro, Berkel Kasikci, Domínguez-Soberanes, Capozzi, Cotter, Doo, Gündüz Ergün, Guzel, Harsa, Hastaoglu, Humblot, Hyseni, Hosoglu, Issa, Karakaş-Budak, Karakaya, Kesenkas, Keyvan, Künili, Kütt, Laranjo, Louis, Mantzouridou, Matalas, Mayo, Mojsova, Mukherjee, Nikolaou, Ortakci, Paveljšek, Perrone, Pertziger, Santa, Sar, Savary-Auzeloux, Schwab, Starowicz, Stojanović, Syrpas, Tamang, Yerlikaya, Yilmaz, Malagon-Rojas, Salminen, Frias, Chassard and Vergères.

Keywords

  • fermented foods
  • food characterization
  • food safety
  • functional claims
  • health benefits
  • health claims
  • mechanism of action
  • systematic review

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Health benefits and risks of fermented foods—the PIMENTO initiative'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this