Halloysite nanotube blended nanocomposite ultrafiltration membranes for reactive dye removal

Başak Keskin; Meltem Ağtaş; Türkan Ormancı-Acar; Türker Türken; Derya Y. Imer; Serkan Ünal; Yusuf Z. Menceloğlu; Tuğba Uçar-Demir; Ismail Koyuncu

doi:10.2166/wst.2020.573

Halloysite nanotube blended nanocomposite ultrafiltration membranes for reactive dye removal

Başak Keskin, Meltem Ağtaş, Türkan Ormancı-Acar, Türker Türken, Derya Y. Imer, Serkan Ünal, Yusuf Z. Menceloğlu, Tuğba Uçar-Demir, Ismail Koyuncu^*

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this paper, ultrafiltration (UF) flat sheet membranes were manufactured by introducing two diverse halloysite nanotubes (HNT) size (5 μm and 63 μm) and five different (0, 0.63, 1.88, 3.13, 6.30 wt %) ratios by wet phase inversion. Some characterization methods which are contact angle, zeta potential, viscosity, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and Young's modulus measurements were used for ultrafiltration membranes. Synthetic dye waters which were Setazol Red and Reactive Orange were used for filtration performance tests. These dye solutions were filtered in three different pH conditions and three different temperature conditions for pH and temperature resistance to understand how flux and removal efficiency change. The best water permeability results were obtained as 190.5 LMH and 192 LMH, for halloysite nanotubes (HNT) sizes of 5 μm and 63 μm respectively. The best water and dye performance of UF membrane contains 1.88% w/w ratio of HNT, which showed increased water flux and dye flux of membranes according to different HNT concentrations including ultrafiltration membranes.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	271-283
Number of pages	13
Journal	Water Science and Technology
Volume	83
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2020.573
Publication status	Published - 15 Jan 2021

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© IWA Publishing 2021 Water Science & Technology

Funding

This work was supported by The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBİTAK) under project numbers of 113Y350, 113Y370, 113Y371 and 113Y372. B.K. (PhD student) did the experiments and wrote the article. M.A. (PhD student) did the experiments and revised the article. T.O.A. (Doctor) did the experiments and revised the article. T.T. (Doctor) did SEM characterization analysis. D.Y.I. (Associate Professor) revised the article. S.U. (Associate Professor) revised the article and is project manager. Y.Z.M. (Professor) revised the article. T.U.D. (MSc and R & D Manager) did HNT characterization analysis. I.K. (Professor) revised the article and is project manager. This work was supported by The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) under project numbers of 113Y350, 113Y370, 113Y371 and 113Y372. B.K. (PhD student) did the experiments and wrote the article. M.A. (PhD student) did the experiments and revised the article. T.O.A. (Doctor) did the experiments and revised the article. T.T. (Doctor) did SEM characterization analysis. D.Y.I. (Associate Professor) revised the article. S.U. (Associate Professor) revised the article and is project manager. Y.Z.M. (Professor) revised the article. T.U.D. (MSc and R & D Manager) did HNT characterization analysis. I.K. (Professor) revised the article and is project manager.

Funders	Funder number
TUBITAK
TUBİTAK	113Y370, 113Y371, 113Y350, 113Y372
Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştirma Kurumu

Keywords

Dye rejection
Flat-sheet membrane
Halloysite nanotubes
Ultrafiltration membrane

Access to Document

10.2166/wst.2020.573

Cite this

@article{fc36ab7f4a8747568cc72f14d65c0261,

title = "Halloysite nanotube blended nanocomposite ultrafiltration membranes for reactive dye removal",

abstract = "In this paper, ultrafiltration (UF) flat sheet membranes were manufactured by introducing two diverse halloysite nanotubes (HNT) size (5 μm and 63 μm) and five different (0, 0.63, 1.88, 3.13, 6.30 wt %) ratios by wet phase inversion. Some characterization methods which are contact angle, zeta potential, viscosity, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and Young's modulus measurements were used for ultrafiltration membranes. Synthetic dye waters which were Setazol Red and Reactive Orange were used for filtration performance tests. These dye solutions were filtered in three different pH conditions and three different temperature conditions for pH and temperature resistance to understand how flux and removal efficiency change. The best water permeability results were obtained as 190.5 LMH and 192 LMH, for halloysite nanotubes (HNT) sizes of 5 μm and 63 μm respectively. The best water and dye performance of UF membrane contains 1.88% w/w ratio of HNT, which showed increased water flux and dye flux of membranes according to different HNT concentrations including ultrafiltration membranes.",

keywords = "Dye rejection, Flat-sheet membrane, Halloysite nanotubes, Ultrafiltration membrane",

author = "Ba{\c s}ak Keskin and Meltem Ağta{\c s} and T{\"u}rkan Ormancı-Acar and T{\"u}rker T{\"u}rken and Imer, {Derya Y.} and Serkan {\"U}nal and Menceloğlu, {Yusuf Z.} and Tuğba U{\c c}ar-Demir and Ismail Koyuncu",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} IWA Publishing 2021 Water Science & Technology",

year = "2021",

month = jan,

day = "15",

doi = "10.2166/wst.2020.573",

language = "English",

volume = "83",

pages = "271--283",

journal = "Water Science and Technology",

issn = "0273-1223",

publisher = "IWA Publishing",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Halloysite nanotube blended nanocomposite ultrafiltration membranes for reactive dye removal

AU - Keskin, Başak

AU - Ağtaş, Meltem

AU - Ormancı-Acar, Türkan

AU - Türken, Türker

AU - Imer, Derya Y.

AU - Ünal, Serkan

AU - Menceloğlu, Yusuf Z.

AU - Uçar-Demir, Tuğba

AU - Koyuncu, Ismail

PY - 2021/1/15

Y1 - 2021/1/15

N2 - In this paper, ultrafiltration (UF) flat sheet membranes were manufactured by introducing two diverse halloysite nanotubes (HNT) size (5 μm and 63 μm) and five different (0, 0.63, 1.88, 3.13, 6.30 wt %) ratios by wet phase inversion. Some characterization methods which are contact angle, zeta potential, viscosity, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and Young's modulus measurements were used for ultrafiltration membranes. Synthetic dye waters which were Setazol Red and Reactive Orange were used for filtration performance tests. These dye solutions were filtered in three different pH conditions and three different temperature conditions for pH and temperature resistance to understand how flux and removal efficiency change. The best water permeability results were obtained as 190.5 LMH and 192 LMH, for halloysite nanotubes (HNT) sizes of 5 μm and 63 μm respectively. The best water and dye performance of UF membrane contains 1.88% w/w ratio of HNT, which showed increased water flux and dye flux of membranes according to different HNT concentrations including ultrafiltration membranes.

AB - In this paper, ultrafiltration (UF) flat sheet membranes were manufactured by introducing two diverse halloysite nanotubes (HNT) size (5 μm and 63 μm) and five different (0, 0.63, 1.88, 3.13, 6.30 wt %) ratios by wet phase inversion. Some characterization methods which are contact angle, zeta potential, viscosity, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and Young's modulus measurements were used for ultrafiltration membranes. Synthetic dye waters which were Setazol Red and Reactive Orange were used for filtration performance tests. These dye solutions were filtered in three different pH conditions and three different temperature conditions for pH and temperature resistance to understand how flux and removal efficiency change. The best water permeability results were obtained as 190.5 LMH and 192 LMH, for halloysite nanotubes (HNT) sizes of 5 μm and 63 μm respectively. The best water and dye performance of UF membrane contains 1.88% w/w ratio of HNT, which showed increased water flux and dye flux of membranes according to different HNT concentrations including ultrafiltration membranes.

KW - Dye rejection

KW - Flat-sheet membrane

KW - Halloysite nanotubes

KW - Ultrafiltration membrane

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85100251099&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2166/wst.2020.573

DO - 10.2166/wst.2020.573

M3 - Article

C2 - 33504693

AN - SCOPUS:85100251099

SN - 0273-1223

VL - 83

SP - 271

EP - 283

JO - Water Science and Technology

JF - Water Science and Technology

IS - 2

ER -

Halloysite nanotube blended nanocomposite ultrafiltration membranes for reactive dye removal

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Funding

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this