Fuzzy multicriteria evaluation of health research investments

Cengiz Kahraman, Aslı Süder, İhsan Kaya*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Health research and investments are expensive, and its explicit social, health and economic impacts are hard to define. There are many challenges and assumptions in defining specific returns on investment in health research. In the literature, there is no common approach to evaluate health research impacts. Single criterion methods are generally used with validated indicators to track overall outcomes or outcomes in a specific health research area. These methods have the ability of considering only one criterion at a time, which is usually the cost of the investment. A multicriteria method is proposed for taking care of many conflicting criteria of health research investments. The difficulty of measuring intangible criteria is captured by the fuzzy set theory. Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (AHP) is used for the selection among four possible health research investment alternatives. A sensitivity analysis is made for the changes in the values of various parameters.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)210-226
Number of pages17
JournalTechnological and Economic Development of Economy
Volume20
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2014

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2014 Vilnius Gediminas Technical University (VGTU) Press.

Keywords

  • AHP
  • Fuzzy sets
  • Health research
  • Investment
  • Multiple criteria

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Fuzzy multicriteria evaluation of health research investments'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this