Abstract
This study investigates informal peer-critique, mainly focusing on the mechanisms of the process and the varying platforms that design students utilize. It aims at providing a preliminary understanding of the peer-critiquing process by highlighting various aspects during its execution. To achieve this, an empirical study was conducted that consisted of two stages: observing the design studio classes and jury reviews of third-year design students, and carrying out semi-structured interviews with students who were volunteers to share their peer-critiquing experiences. The empirical data was analyzed by addressing two types of informal peer-critique: instant peer-critique and planned peer-critique. The analysis is framed by focusing on three important aspects: design phases in which informal peer-critique occurs, basic steps of informal peer-critique, and peers’ activities during informal peer-critiquing processes. By presenting the data by referring to these points, an introductory description of the informal peer-critiquing process is offered.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Proximity in Design Research |
Subtitle of host publication | People, Processes, Products, Philosophy |
Publisher | Taylor and Francis |
Pages | 94-106 |
Number of pages | 13 |
ISBN (Electronic) | 9781040313176 |
ISBN (Print) | 9781032835037 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Jan 2025 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2025 selection and editorial matter, Rita Assoreira Almendra; individual chapters, the contributors. All rigts reserved.