TY - JOUR
T1 - Experimental assessment of polynomial nonlinear state-space and nonlinear-mode models for near-resonant vibrations
AU - Scheel, Maren
AU - Kleyman, Gleb
AU - Tatar, Ali
AU - Brake, Matthew R.W.
AU - Peter, Simon
AU - Noël, Jean Philippe
AU - Allen, Matthew S.
AU - Krack, Malte
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2020/9
Y1 - 2020/9
N2 - In the present paper, two existing nonlinear system identification methodologies are used to identify data-driven models. The first methodology focuses on identifying the system using steady-state excitations. To accomplish this, a phase-locked loop controller is implemented to acquire periodic oscillations near resonance and construct a nonlinear-mode model. This model is based on amplitude-dependent modal properties, i.e. does not require nonlinear basis functions. The second methodology exploits uncontrolled experiments with broadband random inputs to build polynomial nonlinear state-space models using advanced system identification tools. The methods are applied to two experimental test rigs, a magnetic cantilever beam and a free-free beam with a lap joint. The respective models obtained by either method for both specimens are then challenged to predict dynamic, near-resonant behavior observed under different sine and sine-sweep excitations. The vibration prediction of the nonlinear-mode and state-space models clearly highlight capabilities and limitations. The nonlinear-mode model, by design, yields a perfect match at resonance peaks and high accuracy in close vicinity. However, it is limited to well-spaced modes and sinusoidal excitation. The state-space model covers a wider dynamic range, including transient excitations. However, the real-life nonlinearities considered in this study can only be approximated by polynomial basis functions. Consequently, the identified state-space models are found to be highly input-dependent, in particular for sinusoidal excitations where they are found to lead to a low predictive capability.
AB - In the present paper, two existing nonlinear system identification methodologies are used to identify data-driven models. The first methodology focuses on identifying the system using steady-state excitations. To accomplish this, a phase-locked loop controller is implemented to acquire periodic oscillations near resonance and construct a nonlinear-mode model. This model is based on amplitude-dependent modal properties, i.e. does not require nonlinear basis functions. The second methodology exploits uncontrolled experiments with broadband random inputs to build polynomial nonlinear state-space models using advanced system identification tools. The methods are applied to two experimental test rigs, a magnetic cantilever beam and a free-free beam with a lap joint. The respective models obtained by either method for both specimens are then challenged to predict dynamic, near-resonant behavior observed under different sine and sine-sweep excitations. The vibration prediction of the nonlinear-mode and state-space models clearly highlight capabilities and limitations. The nonlinear-mode model, by design, yields a perfect match at resonance peaks and high accuracy in close vicinity. However, it is limited to well-spaced modes and sinusoidal excitation. The state-space model covers a wider dynamic range, including transient excitations. However, the real-life nonlinearities considered in this study can only be approximated by polynomial basis functions. Consequently, the identified state-space models are found to be highly input-dependent, in particular for sinusoidal excitations where they are found to lead to a low predictive capability.
KW - Jointed structures
KW - Modal testing, nonlinear normal modes
KW - Nonlinear modal analysis
KW - Nonlinear system identification
KW - Polynomial nonlinear state-space identification
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85081986979&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.106796
DO - 10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.106796
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85081986979
SN - 0888-3270
VL - 143
JO - Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing
JF - Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing
M1 - 106796
ER -