Abstract
Do negative emotions always have negative outcomes for brands? May feeling of being fooled turn into a sympathy toward the brand? This study aims to investigate the relationship between consumers’ feelings of being fooled and their tendency to get revenge by cheating the brand (dishonest consumer behavior). It further argues that in order to compensate for the negative emotional consequence (feeling of guilt) of their own wrong act, consumers tend to form stronger relationships with the brands that were initially wrong to them. It also examines how situational ambiguity regulates the relationship between feeling befooled and behaving dishonestly.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Developments in Marketing Science |
Subtitle of host publication | Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science |
Publisher | Springer Nature |
Pages | 813-825 |
Number of pages | 13 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2019 |
Publication series
Name | Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science |
---|---|
ISSN (Print) | 2363-6165 |
ISSN (Electronic) | 2363-6173 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2019, Academy of Marketing Science.
Keywords
- Cheating
- Consumer-brand relationship
- Dishonest consumer behavior
- Guilt